Closed sjdaines closed 1 month ago
Describe the bug 🐞
Releases v3.25.0, v3.25.1 show regressions for OptimizationOptimJL.Optim.BFGS() when used with upper/lower bounds (v3.25.0, see https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/747) and when used with user-supplied derivative in combination with upper/lower bounds (v3.25.1 https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/754)
Expected behavior
Ideally tests should exist that catch these problems before release...
Edit - apologies, looks like the real problem here is perhaps how the tests are organized, which makes it difficult to maintain and add tests in response to issues and fixes? See https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/pull/758#issuecomment-2122654473
Minimal Reproducible Example 👇
See https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/747#issuecomment-2119192984, https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/754
Additional context
Describe the bug 🐞
Releases v3.25.0, v3.25.1 show regressions for OptimizationOptimJL.Optim.BFGS() when used with upper/lower bounds (v3.25.0, see https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/747) and when used with user-supplied derivative in combination with upper/lower bounds (v3.25.1 https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/754)
Expected behavior
Ideally tests should exist that catch these problems before release...
Edit - apologies, looks like the real problem here is perhaps how the tests are organized, which makes it difficult to maintain and add tests in response to issues and fixes? See https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/pull/758#issuecomment-2122654473
Minimal Reproducible Example 👇
See https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/747#issuecomment-2119192984, https://github.com/SciML/Optimization.jl/issues/754
Additional context