Closed TorkelE closed 7 months ago
I completely agree about p
, the letter is very overloaded. Also, this parameter is not normally changed by a user. I will rename it next week.
For funcs_to_check
, the change would be more noticeable (this keyword is often used) while the advantages of quants_to_check
(which I do not deny! ) over the current name do not seem to be significant for such a change. Maybe this would wait for a larger interface revision.
The Catlayst/SI extension (https://github.com/SciML/Catalyst.jl/pull/709) should be merged soon (just waiting for an issue that popped up in Symbolcis that causes Catlayst tests to fail generally).
One thing that came up there was if there could be better names for some
kwargs
. E.g. thep
kwarg for guaranteed minimum probability of correctness. Throughout SciML,p
generally means parameters. In the end, we decided to useprob_threshold
in the extension (which is then passed asp
to SI.jl internally). Changing it in SI might be something to consider?Another one that came up was whether
quantities_to_identify
orquants_to_ident
, or maybequants_to_check
would be better thanfuncs_to_check
. This one, however, is kept asfuncs_to_check
in Catalyst for now.