Closed jeandet closed 8 months ago
For a spectrogram, we don't need to define a label for each data component...
I think you have the same problem with this CDAWeb parameter
>>> import speasy as spz
>>> mms1_dis_energyspectr_omni_fast = spz.get_data(
... spz.inventories.tree.cda.MMS.MMS1.DIS.MMS1_FPI_FAST_L2_DIS_MOMS.mms1_dis_energyspectr_omni_fast, "2019-01-02T15:30",
... "2019-01-02T20")
>>> mms1_dis_energyspectr_omni_fast.columns
['DEF_omni']
>>> mms1_dis_energyspectr_omni_fast.values
array([[ 88873.6015625 , 52076.25390625, 67580.1484375 , ...,
952113.375 , 1113830.75 , 1006203.8125 ],
[ 67058.828125 , 34980.6015625 , 45100.02734375, ...,
971669.5625 , 1124289.375 , 1000310.0625 ],
[ 65529.484375 , 54712.4765625 , 49212.6015625 , ...,
976081.75 , 1111816.125 , 1066082.375 ],
...,
[ 24619.7265625 , 0. , 0. , ...,
478687.3125 , 199476.578125 , 101960.5078125 ],
[ 0. , 0. , 1759.7244873 , ...,
523574.90625 , 278838.625 , 79713.8203125 ],
[ 0. , 0. , 14445.49511719, ...,
410759.90625 , 193136.21875 , 81875.1953125 ]])
@brenard-irap my bad I overlooked, since there was only two columns I thought that is was a simple timeserie.
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
476008b
) 86.50% compared to head (8bc4b4f
) 86.43%.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
@brenard-irap the CI issue looks legit, with CDF output format it looks like I get a single column name for a 2 columns variable:
Looks like an issue on ADMA side?