codecov[bot]
commented
4 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
33a0091) 87.33% compared to head (409b299) 87.33%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #121 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 87.33% 87.33% ======================================= Files 51 51 Lines 3166 3166 Branches 515 515 ======================================= Hits 2765 2765 Misses 261 261 Partials 140 140 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/SciQLop/speasy/pull/121/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=SciQLop) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/SciQLop/speasy/pull/121/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=SciQLop) | `86.70% <100.00%> (-0.61%)` | :arrow_down: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=SciQLop#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The current code works but generates a warning and will generate an error in the future.