Closed deepakkumar1984 closed 5 years ago
I'll expose sum
to np
. You can use it as extension temporarily.
Oh, I saw you already assigned to yourself. Are you going to PR?
The function seems counting if the element of both array is equal. it should be Sum of array elements over a given axis. So the parameter need to be an axis.
def sum(a, axis=None, dtype=None, out=None, keepdims=np._NoValue, initial=np._NoValue):
"""
Sum of array elements over a given axis.
Parameters
----------
a : array_like
Elements to sum.
axis : None or int or tuple of ints, optional
Axis or axes along which a sum is performed. The default,
axis=None, will sum all of the elements of the input array. If
axis is negative it counts from the last to the first axis.
.. versionadded:: 1.7.0
If axis is a tuple of ints, a sum is performed on all of the axes
specified in the tuple instead of a single axis or all the axes as
before.
dtype : dtype, optional
The type of the returned array and of the accumulator in which the
elements are summed. The dtype of `a` is used by default unless `a`
has an integer dtype of less precision than the default platform
integer. In that case, if `a` is signed then the platform integer
is used while if `a` is unsigned then an unsigned integer of the
same precision as the platform integer is used.
out : ndarray, optional
Alternative output array in which to place the result. It must have
the same shape as the expected output, but the type of the output
values will be cast if necessary.
keepdims : bool, optional
If this is set to True, the axes which are reduced are left
in the result as dimensions with size one. With this option,
the result will broadcast correctly against the input array.
If the default value is passed, then `keepdims` will not be
passed through to the `sum` method of sub-classes of
`ndarray`, however any non-default value will be. If the
sub-class' method does not implement `keepdims` any
exceptions will be raised.
initial : scalar, optional
Starting value for the sum. See `~numpy.ufunc.reduce` for details.
.. versionadded:: 1.15.0
Returns
-------
sum_along_axis : ndarray
An array with the same shape as `a`, with the specified
axis removed. If `a` is a 0-d array, or if `axis` is None, a scalar
is returned. If an output array is specified, a reference to
`out` is returned.
See Also
--------
ndarray.sum : Equivalent method.
cumsum : Cumulative sum of array elements.
trapz : Integration of array values using the composite trapezoidal rule.
mean, average
Notes
-----
Arithmetic is modular when using integer types, and no error is
raised on overflow.
The sum of an empty array is the neutral element 0:
>>> np.sum([])
0.0
Examples
--------
>>> np.sum([0.5, 1.5])
2.0
>>> np.sum([0.5, 0.7, 0.2, 1.5], dtype=np.int32)
1
>>> np.sum([[0, 1], [0, 5]])
6
>>> np.sum([[0, 1], [0, 5]], axis=0)
array([0, 6])
>>> np.sum([[0, 1], [0, 5]], axis=1)
array([1, 5])
If the accumulator is too small, overflow occurs:
>>> np.ones(128, dtype=np.int8).sum(dtype=np.int8)
-128
You can also start the sum with a value other than zero:
>>> np.sum([10], initial=5)
15
"""
if isinstance(a, _gentype):
# 2018-02-25, 1.15.0
warnings.warn(
"Calling np.sum(generator) is deprecated, and in the future will give a different result. "
"Use np.sum(np.fromiter(generator)) or the python sum builtin instead.",
DeprecationWarning, stacklevel=2)
res = _sum_(a)
if out is not None:
out[...] = res
return out
return res
return _wrapreduction(a, np.add, 'sum', axis, dtype, out, keepdims=keepdims,
initial=initial)
Hi, seems there is an issue with np.sum for axis -1. The result I am getting is SumAll whereas should be sum at axis -1 which for 2D will be 1, 3D will be 2.
Python version:
In NumSharp I get 45 for the same invoke.
OK, -1 means last axis. Will add next release.
by the way, many NumSharp methods use -1 for the default axis right now. these will all have to be changed to use int? instead of int for axis and use null instead of -1 for the default axis
Oh, I will fix them one by one.
This bug has not been fixed (at least not merged into master). The implementation of NDArray.sum.cs does not sum the elements, but counts the number of elements that are equal, just like @deepakkumar1984 stated in his reply. I saw that this old issue existed when I was about to create a new one regarding the bug.
np.sum
and many np.*
functions are limited to 2 dimensions. this is part of a work in progress on my local.
I'll close this once we have a solid multi-dim sum support.
This issue should be resolved in the new release of NumSharp 0.11.0-alpha2 and available on nuget. If it persists, Reopen the issue let us know please.
I am in v4.0.30319, sum function is still not working with NDArray double datatype.
Implement np.sum https://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy/reference/generated/numpy.sum.html