Closed stephenworsley closed 1 year ago
@SciTools-incubator/esmf-regrid-devs This issue is stale due to a lack of activity in the last 90 days. Remove stale label or comment, otherwise this issue will close automatically in 7 days time.
This could also be part of decoupling compatibility checking from the stricter iris approach. It would be useful to do this since when saving and loading a regridder, certain aspects of the attached grid/mesh may change, notably the var_name
and the iunderlying values of any masked points in attached data. Currently these may cause regridders to error innapropriately.
@SciTools-incubator/esmf-regrid-devs This issue is stale due to a lack of activity in the last 90 days. Remove stale label or comment, otherwise this issue will close automatically in 7 days time.
@SciTools-incubator/esmf-regrid-devs This stale issue has been automatically closed due to no community activity
In the case where there are cubes with multiple types of grid/mesh and multiple regridders, it would be good to have a quick way to check if a particular cube is compatible with a particular regridder. This could be done with a
is_compatible
method which would take a cube as an argument and returnTrue
when that cube could be appropriately regrid by the regridder. It is also possible that we could refine the equality checks to be more performant and focused on the information relevant to each regridder e.g. only checking node lat/lon andface_node_connectivity
for area weighted regridders.