Open MikeSchulze opened 7 months ago
I think I was going to add it at some point, but there is an ambiguity regarding some core functions inherited e.g. from Node
etc.
Consider the code:
func _ready():
pass
func public_foo():
pass
func _private_foo():
pass
To me, the above order is ok - first we got essential, inherited functions , then public ones ,then private ones. The problem is, however, that the gdtoolkit
is unable to tell if _ready()
is implicitly inherited and therefore it cannot differentiate between _ready()
and _private_foo()
. Thus having
class-definitions-order:
- static_func
- public_func
- private_func
would require the code to be:
func public_foo():
pass
func _ready():
pass
func _private_foo():
pass
How would you resolve that?
Hello, thank you for the answer. I would not make a distinction between core and user private functions. But if you can read the original class definition, it would be possible. Unfortunately, I don't see an example of static functions in your example.
class-definitions-order:
- static_func
- public_func
- private_func
Should be result in
static func bar():
pass
static func _bar():
pass
func foo():
pass
func _ready():
pass
func _foo():
pass
Okay, I'll experiment with that.
Hi, I love the tool, but I miss the option to sort by function types.
Please add options to check the sort order, for static, public and private functions