Closed mezger6 closed 3 months ago
Hello, what is the ID of your heater entity when using input_number ? I may select the right domain by looking for it in the entity ID.
That's a good idea, the id is input_number.thermostat_control_output
@mezger6 Hello! I use mqtt number instead. Also tried input_number first, but it's not working. I am also support your idea, input_number would be better.
Hello there! I have the same problem, and turns out I'd better ask for a possibility to omit heater entity at all, because in an automation rule I recalc 0-100 of control_output into necessary range and assign to the entity I need. So I need to create a template switch to use it for nothing except providing to the smart thermostat as dummy output.
Hello and congratulations for your very good work!
While trying out the latest feature for a 0-100% heater entity when pwm is set to zero, it turns out that input_number helpers cannot be used. This is because the 'set_value' service is called always under the 'number' domain - if it could be conditionally called under the 'input_number' domain as well, it would also work with helpers.
My use case is radiators heated by a gas boiler connected with opentherm gateway(OTGW), without an external thermostat. HA controls the water temperature setpoint via a service provided by the OTGW integration. The 0-100% output of the smart thermostat is mapped to the min-max water temperature (30 to 75 in my case) and then sent to the boiler via an automation that calls the service.
Up to now I use the control_output atttribute directly, and a dummy switch for the heater entity. It works quite well, but it would be cleaner and better to have an input_number helper receive the 0-100% output and use that to control the boiler. I imagine there would be other use cases where an intermediary needs to receive the output.
Thank you for your consideration