Closed TheCelticGuy closed 4 years ago
It’s going from frequency to time so yes it’s technically iFFT.
Thought so, Keith's blog seems to never mention that it is IFFT and refers to it as FFT. But according to the IFFT equation you have to divide the result by the resolution N aka 1/N or in the 2D case by 1/N^2:
https://www.rfwireless-world.com/Terminology/IFFT-vs-FFT.html
But neither you nor Keith's blog seem to do this - only permutate the signs - so i am a bit confused. The math is rather difficult to grasp as it is lol !
Have i misunderstood the code some where or missed where you divide the results ?
I made this a long time ago so cant really remember and I am no expert on the subject so dont know.
Ah, fair enough :)
Hey
Just been looking through the code and the original blog post, i am still unsure if the Fourier transform being used is an iFFT or an FFT - do you happen to know which one it is ?
I get the impression that it converts frequency to time domain so it would need iFFT but then the original blog doesn't do the inversion so its a bit confusing..