Closed aaaaalbert closed 8 years ago
@rf1591, please review!
Looks good to me! Multiple file testing will definitely be useful.
I will test various modules with the updated utf.py. So far, I have gotten the same pass/fails for repy_v2.
On Tuesday, July 19, 2016, aaaaalbert notifications@github.com wrote:
@rf1591 https://github.com/rf1591, please review!
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SeattleTestbed/utf/pull/73#issuecomment-233668230, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ANcxEb_OJvsxDItMOW2sJIpaT4z7FX1Iks5qXOvxgaJpZM4JP2Jd .
Raymond Fok New York University Tandon School of Engineering BS Computer Science '19
utf
unit tests check that -a
really runs setup/subprocess/shutdown scripts for all modules. touch
a few files for made-up module names and see....)
Issue #69 suggested to replace
optparse
withargparse
. Issue #71 suggested to make this the module test sequence: setup -- spawn subprocess -- run test cases -- tear down subprocess -- shutdown. Issue #72 requested to allow for multiple files to be speficied for the-f
command-line option.