SecretDecks / Catalyst-Proposals

The repository for our voted 'Catalyst' proposals
0 stars 2 forks source link

F6 Written summary #10

Closed DanM3rcurius closed 2 years ago

DanM3rcurius commented 2 years ago

A 2/3 page written summary ‘Project Close Report’ listing KPIs and how they were (or were not) addressed and what the next stage plans are with the product or service that was developed. An example project close report can be viewed here https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1SSW2afDX5w30aTZYF3p7o7rLUep7v0TJ?usp=sharing

Here's the final report

DanM3rcurius commented 2 years ago

Contribution Survey Summary

Work Reward Sentiment Analysis

Participants: 7

Question no. 1

How do you feel about the distinction between Remunerations and Tips?

Answer

average of 3.43 of 5 possible

Feedback to consider

Tips are associated with optional payments in the service industry. Should we rename tips to something else to remove the service industry allusion?

Positive Statements

I think creating the distinction and rewarding intangible contributions is very beneficial towards the overall health of community driven projects. I think we have an opportunity to improve how the distinction is communicated to those unfamiliar with DisCo's.

Summary

  • action needs to be taken soon! Rework communication (terminology!) and what non financial rewards actually are besides NFTs

    To Do

  • [ ] define non financial rewards!!

Question no. 2

Looking at the Remuneration calculation and distribution, do you think it's fair?

Answer

mixed; 3 yes, 3 not sure, 1 no

Positive Statements

I appreciate the fact that care-work and other intangible contributions are acknowledged at a more quantifiable level. I believe that by doing this, it may inspire more members to contribute this 'energetic glue' that often holds communities together. Within the status quo, these actions are given verbal kudos at best, incentivising people to focus their energy on tangible impact

Summary

Question no. 3

Looking at the Tip calculation and distribution, do you feel that you and everyone else in the community has been rewarded evenly and fairly?

Answer

average 4 of 5 total

Feedback to consider

-> I think it's fair and only assume that most receiving 29.14 ADA and some 29.13 is a division thing Should we round down the tips to an even amount to cover for varying transaction fees?

-> I intuitively think it is fair, but find it difficult to find the data that backs this up. I know that it exists, but it may be hard to find for a new community member. Where should the dataset links be displayed?

Positive Statements

Fair because those are clearly the most active members.

The amount was more of a felt sense of fairness. The process of distribution was transparent and easy to see. That's good!

Summary

  • No urgent action needed Was clear and fair if link to dataset has been found; have to make link more prominent;

    To Do

  • [ ] discuss with cooperative where best place(s) for link to dataset is!

Contribution Survey Sentiment

Participants: 5

Question no. 1

How intuitive was creating and filing the contribution survey?

Answer

3.8 average of 5 total

Feedback to consider

The survey is too general. Not targeted to individual needs.

Not sure. Perhaps we should explore ways to present tracking and rewards in real time through a graphical interface?

Positive Statements

I found it intuitive and easy to do, but Github can be a challenge for some.

Summary

  • no urgent action needed Create individualised surveys via Yaml templates and automate filling out via GitHub actions

    To Do

  • [ ] Enhance Survey (pre-filling) and process (automatic creation and notification) #

    Survey Summary Template

    Question

    Answer

    Feedback to consider

    Positive Statements

    Summary

    To Do

DanM3rcurius commented 2 years ago

GitBook for prop