DanM3rcurius
commented
3 years ago @stephen-rowan and @evolayak please review 🙏🏿
Closed DanM3rcurius closed 3 years ago
DanM3rcurius
commented
3 years ago @stephen-rowan and @evolayak please review 🙏🏿
stephen-rowan
commented
3 years ago I approve ✅
I have added "Social / Emotional Support" check and Contribution vote - Stephen Whitenstall
More comprehensive than my form I will have to use this as reference ! I guess ADA per hour is a snapshot (as the price varies) ?
evolayak
commented
3 years ago Question- where would artist onboarding fall? Or should it have it's own category... I see it as a segue from outreach to creation/digitising the decks; facilitating the incubation process if that's needed, to Art Curation. So, a process in it's own. Could also go under intangible work maybe.
DanM3rcurius
commented
3 years ago I approve ✅
I have added "Social / Emotional Support" check and Contribution vote - Stephen Whitenstall
More comprehensive than my form I will have to use this as reference ! I guess ADA per hour is a snapshot (as the price varies) ?
ADA per hour is what I feel ADA is worth at point of filling out (which was about 1,50€/ADA). Next writing this will probably be less ADA, as smart contract functionality will be available on testnet and that drives my personal valuation up at least 10-15%.
DanM3rcurius
commented
3 years ago Question- where would artist onboarding fall? Or should it have it's own category... I see it as a segue from outreach to creation/digitising the decks; facilitating the incubation process if that's needed, to Art Curation. So, a process in it's own. Could also go under intangible work maybe.
Depending on what steps during the onboarding. The whole onboarding (if from start to end) stretches over many categories: Business - NEtworking; Creative - Artist outreach + Curation ; Intangible - greeting new members.
Thoughts @stephen-rowan ?
stephen-rowan
commented
3 years ago @DanM3rcurius , @evolayak - I suggest we workshop/review the contributions survey to completely revise it to our needs. A lot of the categories were included for NFT-DAO. We could do this as a meeting or just share a markdown version on GitHub and revise from there ?
DanM3rcurius
commented
3 years ago Meeting might be more effective at this point? I could make some room late this evening (2100CEST) Or tomorrow during the day before the weekly. Heather is busy with another project until Wednesday I think.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 13:01, Stephen Whitenstall @.***> wrote:
@DanM3rcurius , @.***(https://github.com/evolayak) - I suggest we workshop/review the contributions survey to completely revise it to our needs. A lot of the categories were included for NFT-DAO. We could do this as a meeting or just share a markdown version on GitHub and revise from there ?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
evolayak
commented
3 years ago Hi there! the soonest I'm free is tomorrow at 6pm. )I have another call this evening, 8pm to 10:30pm or so and appointments all day tomorrow more or less). Would an hour before the weekly meeting be enough?
DanM3rcurius
commented
3 years ago We’ll make it work 👍
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 15:19, evolayak @.***> wrote:
Hi there! the soonest I'm free is tomorrow at 6pm. )I have another call this evening, 8pm to 10:30pm or so and appointments all day tomorrow more or less). Would an hour before the weekly meeting be enough?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or unsubscribe.
Autonomous Creator Organisation (ACO) - Contribution-Survey
Detailed Expalanation below
General Information
This provides an overall summary or context of a member, when they became involved and how many days they have worked. This could be supplemented with a contribution vote by peers to capture the more intangible contribution a member has made.
Work areas
A member can indicate the different work areas they have worked in and provide an estimate of Days / Hours worked in each area. The areas are Development , Marketing, Governance, Business, Creative, Product and Intangible work. Intangible work is meant to capture contributions not covered by the scope of a work area.
Cost calculations (to be decided)
Hours/Days worked - Costs A variable rate may be applied depending up the cost/rate of the contributor (their hourly rate and work costs).
Development
Each work area will be divided into appropriate categories (e.g. Code, UX etc.) and be accompanied with an "Outputs" section where members can record what they have produced, built, documented etc.
Marketing
Governance
Business
Product
Creative - Art
Intangible work
Peer Review
Group
After the survey each contribution is assessed for due diligence by the appropriate work area Group - to confirm that there is agreement that the work took place etc.
ACO
After the survey - intangibles are voted upon per member by the ACO.
Reward and evaluation
Once the above process is completed a member may choose either to be awarded -
Autonomous Creator Organisation (ACO) - Contribution-Survey
The key approach is to capture contributions first and assess value last. Detailed Expalanation below
Why ? Because value led models typically dictate the nature of contributions e.g. a financial incentive contribution model will tend to favor immediate returns, an equal share of rewards upfront will penalize those who have contributed more than others etc.
A contribution led model either tracks or audits ACO member contributions first. Then rewards (in ADA) or recognition (in a Token) are applied to the contribution data afterwards.
Identity
This survey encourages ACO members to identify themselves as it provides a record of their contribution.
However an anon ID option should be available and peer reviewed per work area.
DAO Contribution-Survey Design by Stephen Whitenstall is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.