Seddryck / Expressif

Expressif is the variable substitution syntax combined with a library of predicates and functions. Initially designed for NBi.io, Expressif allows you to define variables, transformations of these variables (with expressions and functions), in plain text, which can then be interpreted by the engine. Same can be done with predicates.
Apache License 2.0
1 stars 0 forks source link

chore: bump NUnit.Analyzers from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0 in /Expressif.Testing #272

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 5 months ago

dependabot[bot] commented 6 months ago

Bumps NUnit.Analyzers from 4.1.0 to 4.2.0.

Release notes

Sourced from NUnit.Analyzers's releases.

NUnit Analyzers 4.2 - April 24, 2024

This release of the Analyzers extends NUnit2050 to also cover Assume and Nunit1032 to consider dispose of a type having explicit interface implementation. Furthermore, named parameters are now handled correctly codefixes for classical asserts, and NUnit2010 improves the logic for determining Equals methods.

The release contains contributions from the following users (in alphabetical order):

Issues Resolved

Features and Enhancements

  • #731 Add test for wrapping conditional expression in parenthesis for NUnit2050
  • #720 Replace UpdateStringFormatToFormattableString with String.Format
  • #719 NUnit2050 should cover Assume
  • #710 Nunit1032 - consider dispose of a type having explicit interface implementation

Bugs

  • #728 NUnit2010 - do not consider Equals call if it doesn't override Object.Equals
  • #712 [bug] Code fix for NUnit2005 does not correctly fix Assert.AreEqual if named parameters are used in unexpected order

Tooling, Process, and Documentation

  • #733 Missing full stops added to NUnit2050
  • #722 Use Markdown for CHANGES
  • #708 chore: bump-version
Changelog

Sourced from NUnit.Analyzers's changelog.

# NUnit Analyzers 4.2 - April 24, 2024

This release of the Analyzers extends NUnit2050 to also cover Assume and Nunit1032 to consider dispose of a type having explicit interface implementation. Furthermore, named parameters are now handled correctly codefixes for classical asserts, and NUnit2010 improves the logic for determining Equals methods.

The release contains contributions from the following users (in alphabetical order):

Issues Resolved

Features and Enhancements

  • #731 Add test for wrapping conditional expression in parenthesis for NUnit2050
  • #720 Replace UpdateStringFormatToFormattableString with String.Format
  • #719 NUnit2050 should cover Assume
  • #710 Nunit1032 - consider dispose of a type having explicit interface implementation

Bugs

  • #728 NUnit2010 - do not consider Equals call if it doesn't override Object.Equals
  • #712 [bug] Code fix for NUnit2005 does not correctly fix Assert.AreEqual if named parameters are used in unexpected order

Tooling, Process, and Documentation

  • #733 Missing full stops added to NUnit2050
  • #722 Use Markdown for CHANGES
  • #708 chore: bump-version

NUnit Analyzers 4.1 - March 16, 2024

This release of the Analyzers extends the suppression of nullable warnings to also respect assumptions - expressed via Assume.That. Also nullable warnings are suppressed even in the context of the null-forgiving operator !, and NUnit2010 is extended to also cover is pattern expressions - e.g. is null and more general integer patterns as is < 0 or >= 1.

The release contains contributions from the following users (in alphabetical order):

Issues Resolved

Features and Enhancements

... (truncated)

Commits
  • 2c5a93e Merge pull request #735 from nunit/release4.2
  • 5fe049b chore: Update release notes
  • 37ee849 Merge pull request #733 from maettu-this/maettu-this_missing-full-stops-added
  • dfe15f5 Missing full stops added to NUnit2050
  • 07d8594 Sometimes we cannot convert message+args into a formattable string. (#725)
  • d551aac Merge pull request #730 from manfred-brands/Issue728
  • f9cac1d Merge pull request #731 from manfred-brands/Issue729
  • acb700b Add test for wrapping conditional expression in parenthesis for NUnit2050
  • 52bb832 NUnit2010: Exclusions
  • d14cc57 Fix logic around out-of-order arguments for classic assertions (#712) (#716)
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot show ignore conditions` will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
codecov[bot] commented 6 months ago

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 86.17%. Comparing base (de07056) to head (62080b5).

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #272 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 86.17% 86.17% ======================================= Files 132 132 Lines 2444 2444 Branches 396 394 -2 ======================================= Hits 2106 2106 Misses 231 231 Partials 107 107 ```

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.