Seeed-Studio / LoRaWan-E5-Node

Applications on LoRa-E5 mini/ LoRa-E5 Development Kit with v1.1.0 STM32Cube MCU Package for STM32WL series(SDK)
58 stars 27 forks source link

FreeRTOS LoRaWAN AT Command issues #7

Closed ES0R closed 2 years ago

ES0R commented 2 years ago

When running the given AT commands from the FREERTOS LoRaWAN AT build some of the commands fail. I was able to connect to TTN using "AT+JOIN=1" and I was able to use "AT?" but using other commands seems to just result in "AT_ERROR". For example, using "AT+VER" gives an error. I have been unable to locate the error, can this be replicated by any others?

lakshanthad commented 2 years ago

Hello,

Please help me answer the following:

Thank you

ES0R commented 2 years ago

Hello

Sorry for late answer: I'm using the LoRa-E5 Dev Board. I'm using arduino's serial monitor I'm using 115200 as baudrate Yes

lakshanthad commented 2 years ago

Hello,

I will test this and get back to you.

lakshanthad commented 2 years ago

Hello,

I have tested this and you should enter the commands as follows:

To get a value: AT+<CMD>=?

Therefore to get the firmware version, you should enter: AT+VER=?

Make sure of these settings also:

Please let me know how it goes.

Thank you.

shawnventi commented 2 years ago

I believe that some confusion in this issue might be from the fact that the factory AT firmware has a different AT command spec than the project included in this repo.

The factory AT firmware follows this spec: https://files.seeedstudio.com/products/317990687/res/LoRa-E5%20AT%20Command%20Specification_V1.0%20.pdf

@lakshanthad - Is it possible to get a copy of the factory AT firmware that can be used? I'm not looking for the source just a compiled copy that will work on the LoRa-E5 mini dev boards.

bkrajendra commented 1 year ago

Hi, I am also trying to work with FreeRTOS AT firmware. I can get a response for AT?, AT+VER=? etc. But whenever I try to set the value, I get Error AT_PARAM_ERROR What is the right format to set value with AT. I tried AT+DADDR=xxxx, but with no success.