search

Seeed-Studio / seeed-linux-dtoverlays

Device Tree Overlays for Seeed boards
Other
78 stars 55 forks source link

ReTerminal-DM install fails #72

Closed system24seven closed 10 months ago

system24seven commented 10 months ago

Followed https://wiki.seeedstudio.com/reterminal-dm-flash-OS/ to flash the ReTerminal-DM to raspbian 32 bit OS. When running the "sudo ./scripts/reTerminal.sh --device reTerminal-plus" command, a lot of modules seem to build, then the install fails at:

`depmod.....

DKMS: install completed.

Creating symlink /var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/source -> /usr/src/ili9881d-0.1

DKMS: add completed.

Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel. Skipping...

Building module: cleaning build area... make -j4 KERNELRELEASE=5.10.17-v7l+ all KVERSION=5.10.17-v7l+....(bad exit status: 2) Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.10.17-v7l+ (armv7l) Consult /var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/build/make.log for more information. Can't compile with this kernel, aborting Please try to compile with the option --compat-kernel DKMS make.log for ili9881d-0.1 for kernel 5.10.17-v7l+ (armv7l) Tue 5 Sep 11:23:36 BST 2023 make -C /lib/modules/5.10.17-v7l+/build M=/var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/build modules make[1]: Entering directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.17-v7l+' CC [M] /var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/build/ili9881d.o /var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/build/ili9881d.c: In function ‘ili9881d_dsi_probe’: /var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/build/ili9881d.c:501:12: error: ‘struct drm_panel’ has no member named ‘prepare_upstream_first’ 501 | ctx->panel.prepare_upstream_first = true; | ^ make[2]: [scripts/Makefile.build:279: /var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/build/ili9881d.o] Error 1 make[1]: [Makefile:1804: /var/lib/dkms/ili9881d/0.1/build] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/src/linux-headers-5.10.17-v7l+' make: *** [Makefile:11: all] Error 2 `

I have tried the --compat-kernel, no change to the error log.

uname - a:

Linux raspberrypi 5.10.17-v7l+ #1403 SMP Mon Feb 22 11:33:35 GMT 2021 armv7l GNU/Linux

I have also tried this with the latest kernel (.103) and get same results. I am puropsely needing 32 bit kernel for software compatibility.

system24seven commented 10 months ago

Turns out that the minimum kernel version is not displayed anywhere.