Closed jeffjanes closed 5 years ago
Hey @rdunklau @rdunklau-4ct @rvernica,
It would be great if this can be merged as PostgreSQL 11 is with us for some time.
Thanks for hard work!
Unfortunately, I believe the Kozea folks have stopped giving a damn about this project and abandoned it, as they haven't done anything about it or replied to requests for well over a year now. I wish they would give collaborator access to people keen on maintaining it before the project rots away.
Unfortunately, I believe the Kozea folks have stopped giving a damn about this project and abandoned it, as they haven't done anything about it or replied to requests for well over a year now.
We've not abandoned it (we use it in production), but it's true that we don't spend time on this project anymore.
I wish they would give collaborator access to people keen on maintaining it before the project rots away.
Anyone interested? :smile:
@liZe I'm interested to help here with maintenance.
I'm interested to help here with maintenance.
Thank you! I've invited you in the Multicorn team. Feel free to contact me if you need anything else (like PyPI access for example).
@liZe thank You!
Is there any process setup for package release? I assume because You need pgxn account this is maybe automated via any CI/CD process? Or it's just account that someone owns and releases are manual?
Thanks!
Hi ! I'm the one managing the PGXN account for this project. I'm not really maintaining it anymore since I don't use it myself... I'll try to see if pgxn has a concept of "organizations" now.
@liZe I didn't event know we had a Multicorn organization :) Maybe we should move the repo to that namespace as a first step ?
@liZe I didn't event know we had a Multicorn organization :) Maybe we should move the repo to that namespace as a first step ?
Hi :smile:! It's not an organization, it's a team. If anyone wants to create a separate organization, there's no problem to move the repository.
@liZe @rdunklau let's move that discussion to maybe another issue, I will merge this PR as sounds it's fixing issue with PostgreSQL 11.
Moved discussion to #221
The old way of accessing attributes has finally been removed in favor of TupleDescAttr, so change the code to use that macro. This macro exists back to 9.2.
This fixes issue #206.