Open Muennighoff opened 2 years ago
Hey, good questions!
We did explore adding GPUTreeExplainer
support, but it turned out that the source distribution on PyPI doesn't contain the cuda source files, leading to build failure, see also this issue. On the other hand I see that since version 0.40.0
they are providing manylinux
wheels on PyPI so the issue might be mitigated.
The main benefits for using alibi
wrappers for KernelShap
and TreeShap
instead of the shap
library directly is easier handling of categorical variables, see here. For the other explainers you mentioned I would suggest using the shap
library directly as we haven't seen a benefit for writing wrappers for these in alibi
. (Do note that GradientExplainer
in the shap
library is actually Expected Integrated Gradients).
In any case we would be keen to know more about your use cases and perhaps we can look into supporting these in the future (either via a simple wrapper or looking at our own implementation if relevant).
Hey great library! Why do you not support additional SHAP explainers such as GPUTreeExplainer, DeepExplainer, GradientExplainer or LinearExplainer?