search

SeleniumHQ / seleniumhq.github.io

Official Selenium website and documentation
https://selenium.dev
Apache License 2.0
1.07k stars 1.27k forks source link

interactions of elements csharp code added in github #1728

Closed pallavigitwork closed 3 months ago

pallavigitwork commented 3 months ago

User description

Thanks for contributing to the Selenium site and documentation! A PR well described will help maintainers to review and merge it quickly

Before submitting your PR, please check our contributing guidelines. Avoid large PRs, and help reviewers by making them as simple and short as possible.

Description

interactions of elements csharp code added in github

Motivation and Context

code was not on github and current displayed wasn't correct

Types of changes

Checklist

PR Type

enhancement, documentation

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
InteractionTest.cs
Add comprehensive interaction tests for web elements         
examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs
  • Added a new test method TestInteractionCommands for various
    interactions like click, send keys, and clear.
  • Utilized ChromeDriver for browser operations.
  • Added assertions to verify the behavior of web elements.
  • Browser is properly closed after test execution.
    		•  +44/-1   
    Documentation
    interactions.en.md
    Update English documentation with new CSharp code examples
    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.en.md
  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    		•  +13/-29 
    interactions.ja.md
    Update Japanese documentation with new CSharp code examples
    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.ja.md
  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    		•  +12/-30 
    interactions.pt-br.md
    Update Portuguese documentation with new CSharp code examples
    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.pt-br.md
  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    		•  +9/-29   
    interactions.zh-cn.md
    Update Chinese documentation with new CSharp code examples
    website_and_docs/content/documentation/webdriver/elements/interactions.zh-cn.md
  • Updated CSharp code examples to reflect the new interaction tests.
  • Removed outdated CSharp code snippets.
    		•  +11/-30 

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

    netlify[bot] commented 3 months ago

    Deploy request for selenium-dev pending review.

    Visit the deploys page to approve it

    Name Link
    Latest commit 48dc102e0cac46a2b6a226d791e267eea21dbb0b
    codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 months ago

    PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/seleniumhq.github.io/commit/58baaf708977aa8e8f112a1db12d7db160607ee5)

    codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 months ago

    PR Review 🔍

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5] 2, because the PR involves a moderate amount of new code primarily focused on adding new test methods and updating documentation. The changes are straightforward and localized to specific files, making the review process less complex.
    🧪 Relevant tests Yes
    ⚡ Possible issues Possible Bug: The assertion `Assert.AreEqual(isChecked, false);` in the `TestInteractionCommands` method assumes the checkbox is initially unchecked. If the default state changes or varies, this test could fail. Consider adding a setup step to ensure the checkbox state.
    Code Quality: The repeated pattern of finding an element, performing an action, and then verifying could be refactored into helper methods to improve code readability and reusability.
    🔒 Security concerns No
    codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 3 months ago

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Best practice
    Replace implicit waits with explicit waits for better test reliability ___ **Replace the use of implicit waits with explicit waits to improve the robustness of the
    test. Implicit waits can lead to unpredictable wait times and make the tests flaky.
    Explicit waits are more flexible and can wait for specific conditions.** [examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [15]](https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/seleniumhq.github.io/pull/1728/files#diff-f266d3ffabe94376117605463cfeb1deb16c8f582ce71ec2dbcca49edb0df579R15-R15) ```diff -driver.Manage().Timeouts().ImplicitWait = TimeSpan.FromMilliseconds(500); +WebDriverWait wait = new WebDriverWait(driver, TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10)); +wait.Until(drv => drv.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input")).Displayed); ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the use of implicit waits and proposes a switch to explicit waits, which is a best practice in Selenium testing for more predictable and reliable test outcomes.
    		8
    Robustness
    Add exception handling to WebDriver interactions to manage runtime errors ___ **Add exception handling around the WebDriver interactions to gracefully handle possible
    runtime errors such as elements not being found or not being clickable.** [examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [20-21]](https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/seleniumhq.github.io/pull/1728/files#diff-f266d3ffabe94376117605463cfeb1deb16c8f582ce71ec2dbcca49edb0df579R20-R21) ```diff -IWebElement checkInput = driver.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input")); -checkInput.Click(); +try +{ + IWebElement checkInput = driver.FindElement(By.Name("checkbox_input")); + checkInput.Click(); +} +catch (NoSuchElementException ex) +{ + Console.WriteLine("Element not found: " + ex.Message); +} ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding exception handling around WebDriver interactions is a good practice to make the tests more robust by handling runtime errors gracefully. The suggestion is relevant and improves the code's robustness.
    		7
    Maintainability
    Ensure the browser is always closed by using a finally block ___ **Ensure the browser is quit even if the test fails by placing driver.Quit() in a finally
    block. This prevents browser windows from hanging open if there are errors during test
    execution.** [examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [49]](https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/seleniumhq.github.io/pull/1728/files#diff-f266d3ffabe94376117605463cfeb1deb16c8f582ce71ec2dbcca49edb0df579R49-R49) ```diff -driver.Quit(); +try +{ + // Test commands +} +finally +{ + driver.Quit(); +} ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Placing `driver.Quit()` inside a finally block ensures that the browser is closed even if the test fails, which is crucial for preventing resource leaks and maintaining clean test environments. This is a valuable suggestion for better resource management.
    		7
    Readability
    Use boolean-specific assertions for clarity ___ **Use Assert.IsTrue or Assert.IsFalse for boolean conditions to make the assertions more
    readable and intention-revealing.** [examples/dotnet/SeleniumDocs/Elements/InteractionTest.cs [25]](https://github.com/SeleniumHQ/seleniumhq.github.io/pull/1728/files#diff-f266d3ffabe94376117605463cfeb1deb16c8f582ce71ec2dbcca49edb0df579R25-R25) ```diff -Assert.AreEqual(isChecked, false); +Assert.IsFalse(isChecked); ```
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to use `Assert.IsFalse` instead of `Assert.AreEqual` for boolean conditions enhances readability and makes the intention clearer, which is a good improvement for code clarity.
    		6
    pallavigitwork commented 3 months ago

    Thank you @harsha509 :)