Closed MPica closed 8 months ago
As expressed in its overview, OWL is a computational logic-based language such that knowledge expressed in OWL can be exploited by computer programs.
OntoME is not a GUI for OWL but a tool for designing ontologies. As a result, the constraints imposed by the owl:restrictions property must be explicitly modelled in the development of the model.
So I don't think it makes sense to import these restrictions into OntoME.
49 Classes in RiC-O 1.0 have owl:Restrictions attached to their rdfs:subClassOf or owl:equivalentClass. This kind of information is completely absent from the script as of yet. We need to decide whether to import this information, and in what shape. @valamercery @stephenhart8, I believe you are the best informed.
One example
Here is the same example in the original XML and a TTL conversion for convenience.
The current possibilities
The import schema has the following possibilities (as of now):
For Classes:
For Properties: