Closed kizule closed 10 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
80b0924
) 40.04% compared to head (499158a
) 40.04%.
:exclamation: Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The question is: should we include the latest non-LTS version to indicate that there may be some open issues with a particular version? In my opinion, testing should reveal potential problems before the next LTS version is released. Unfortunately, the official MediaWiki Docker images only appear with the release, so CI could only be adapted to them very late.
What exactly bothers you about the failing CI for 1.40. The red cross?
Having the failing build does make it more difficult to see if something is wrong with the PR, especially if you don't already know that MW 40 is expected to fail.
I have removed 1.40 now
done
Removed MediaWiki 1.40 because of: