Closed oetterer closed 4 years ago
well, last test is still failing. can't see why, though...
@kghbln unless someone can point me towards a fix for that last test, I suggest merging the PR
@JeroenDeDauw Since PHP is not really my field of expertise I will be awesome if you could have a look why PHP 7.3 does not play here. I would like to help but I cannot.
@kghbln found the problem, unfortunately fixing the last test breaks the first one. :(
@oetterer
found the problem, unfortunately fixing the last test breaks the first one. :(
I am not sure what you mean. From my perspective still only PHP 7.3 gives pain and not PHP 7.0
If we have to decide between both versions support for PHP 7.0 could be dropped to make things easier.
@kghbln Look at 92c4415. It contains the fix for the last test, but Travis fails in the first. Current #4c2b74a rolls that back.
Ah, a circulum vitiosum. :( I would like to help but ...
@kghbln just squash and merge?
Wouldn't the test still fail?
Yes. But it did so for quite some time now. Also, the reason why it fails has nothing to do with the patch. I merely tried to include a fix for it.
Generally, thanks for your continued support and swift response to the feature request.
Yes. But it did so for quite some time now. Also, the reason why it fails has nothing to do with the patch. I merely tried to include a fix for it.
Let's be ruled by pragmatism here. This change will be part of a 2.2
release which allows you to kick PHP 7.0 support and means that you
can apply your :void
change.
On 11/16/19, Tobias Oetterer notifications@github.com wrote:
Yes. But it did so for quite some time now. Also, the reason why it fails has nothing to do with the patch. I merely tried to include a fix for it.
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticScribunto/pull/76#issuecomment-554422773
And btw there is nothing broken functionality wise with mw master. A function declaration changed slightly and the test fails on that inconsistency.
Cool, so the changes are void, er contain void? :)
Cool, so the changes are void, er contain void? :)
The latter
The latter
Didn't you revert?
I reverted only the alleged fix for the failing test. The original patch is still there 9852730. So squash and merge and keep the comment from the first commit, pls. :)
no wuckas
This PR is made in reference to: #75
This PR addresses or contains: fixes for said issue
This PR includes:
Fixes #75