SemanticMediaWiki / SemanticSignup

Allows adding additional fields to the user registration form, which get placed on the new users' user page, as well as stored semantically.
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:SemanticSignup
Other
6 stars 3 forks source link

Create 1.0 release #6

Closed JeroenDeDauw closed 9 years ago

JeroenDeDauw commented 9 years ago

Blockers:

Having confirmation that everything is fluff from at least one user would be nice as well.

JeroenDeDauw commented 9 years ago

@mwjames @kghbln

mwjames commented 9 years ago
JeroenDeDauw commented 9 years ago

@SemanticMediaWiki/testers testing of this extension for regressions compared to the previous release is appreciated. You can get the dev version of 1.0 as follows:

composer require mediawiki/semantic-signup:~1.0@dev
mwjames commented 9 years ago

@toniher @jchapin Do see any immediate issues that would stop use putting a 1.0.0 release tag on the current master?

toniher commented 9 years ago

I must apologise, https://github.com/SemanticMediaWiki/SemanticSignup/pull/13, $wgOut could not be avoided so easily

mwjames commented 9 years ago

I must apologise, #13, $wgOut could not be avoided so easily

No need for apologies, I'm glad you are trying to solve this issue.

kghbln commented 9 years ago

I would like to test this extension however there are no instructions how to actually use it. Could anybody post an example form. I feel like I have to reinvent the wheel here. Use {{#signupfields:}}? So what?

kghbln commented 9 years ago

I am sorry for my last post. I am very grumpy today and not getting this to work did not help the cause. Expecting this to be a on-the-fly thing did not help either. I will now stop hijacking this thread -seriously!

kghbln commented 9 years ago
JeroenDeDauw commented 9 years ago

The release notes are still empty - I'm guessing something actually did happen between 0.4 and 1.0? :)

kghbln commented 9 years ago

Well there was a wild "0.5". will add.

kghbln commented 9 years ago

@JeroenDeDauw Guess you got what you wanted. ;)

JeroenDeDauw commented 9 years ago

Everyone fine with making the 1.0 rel?

mwjames commented 9 years ago

I'd say go ahead, I have seen it work for the examples cited which means it does what is advertised. The code isn't pretty but that's another topic.

JeroenDeDauw commented 9 years ago

Done