Open heruka-urgyen opened 9 years ago
Why do not we have this PR on top of #3 and not a master (so may be re-create it)? Also may be it should start with 'initial haskell commit' and does not have anything metheor-related too (even if that's a deletion)
Do you have experience in interactive re-basing? It's super simple with git, but let me know if you need a hand here
What do you think if we have this read from external source
Good idea.
Why do not we have this PR on top of #3
Sorry, my bad. I'll try to rebase it.
Why do not we have this PR on top of #3
Sorry, my bad. I'll try to rebase it.
Sometimes just re-creating a PR is enough and I think that the case here, just create new PR on top of #3 Reabse usually referees actually moving commits around and looks like 'initial haskel' is the first one here.. though now I'm not sure who's parent of 'haskel' branch in git
Initial Haskell implementation. Returns JSON, doesn't use any templates for client-side. A common client-side app will be in a separate pull-request.