Open awesomekling opened 5 years ago
i assume this can be closed as done? (due to 6d1418aa7ad008bff949827fd6a66cb5092665c7 and many others)
Well.. not quite. There's still no way to define static routes :)
i see, should that be available via something like linux's ip utility? or a config file somewhere?
i see, should that be available via something like linux's ip utility? or a config file somewhere?
well, we should ideally allow people to define static routes in a config file and add more or delete some dynamically via the commandline. iirc linux uses a netlink interface between the userland to the Kernel to do this, so I think we can definitely think about this, although I'm not fond of the idea to create lots of interfaces (we already have the sysctl, ioctl, syscalls) if not needed.
We need static routing tables to know which network adapter should be used for which networks.