Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
[deleted comment]
Thanks for reporting.
There are multiple issues triggered by new jquery mobile directory structure.
1. The *structure* files confuse the wizard and cause the error.
Workaround: These should be moved to use the wizard and reinserted into the
created project if the theme roller is being used.
2. jquery-mobile-1.1.0-rc.1.js and jquery.mobile-1.1.0-rc.1.min.js causes the
JSDT validator to fail.
Workaround: Right click on project -> Properties -> JavaScript -> Include Path
-> -> Source -> Exclude -> Edit . See Issue 53
3. demos directory gets included in created project
Workaround: Remove it from the jquery mobile install or after project creation
4. Clean up extra jquery.mobile references in the created index.html file.
Even after making these changes, the jquery attr() function fails in the
sample app. We need to investigate if there is an API change or temporary
regression in the RC.
Original comment by paul.beu...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2012 at 4:18
Thanks for reporting this! In addition to the apparent .attr() failing in the
jQuery Mobile Demo app, on Android 3.1 I am seeing a problem like jQM Issue 3723
(https://github.com/jquery/jquery-mobile/issues/3723).
Read near the end of the comments on Issue 3723 to see the path to 'latest'
jquery.mobile.js. Looks like RC2 will need to undo a lot of RC1 regression.
I'm suggesting AppLaud wait for at least jQM 1.1.0RC2, or 1.1.0 final.
Original comment by libby.ba...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2012 at 4:38
Subissues 1, 3, and 4 from comment #2 are fixed with AppLaud 1.2.8. Leaving
bug open for #2 and for a working jquery.mobile 1.1
Original comment by paul.beu...@gmail.com
on 19 Mar 2012 at 11:37
#2 is worked around with a jsdt hack. see
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/mobile-web-development-with-phonegap/
source/detail?r=159
The jquery attr problem is avoided by rewriting the API example to use id
instead.
http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/p/mobile-web-development-with-phonegap/
source/detail?r=163
Original comment by paul.beu...@gmail.com
on 19 Apr 2012 at 12:55
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
sugarchi...@gmail.com
on 18 Mar 2012 at 4:52