Closed jamesWilliamEdwards closed 3 years ago
Can you supply a small GEDCOM file with a couple of individuals that demonstrates the issue. ie: export a couple of individuals try that in FTAnalyzer to check the problem exists then send that file to ftanalyzer@gmail.com with the steps required to reproduce the issue.
Hi there, I have already sent a file. If you would prefer I can send you another.
I've just seen that file. Unfortunately it's 5Mb in size so not a small snippet of the problem. What I ideally need is a GEDCOM with just couple of individuals in it that still shows the issue. That is because when I load the file I often need to step through the code line by line for each person it processes. If there are thousands of individuals in the file that becomes an impossible task. So ideally I need a file of as small a number of people as possible that still demonstrates the issue.
In addition to the file I need the steps you take to replicate the issue so I can step through the file doing what you did and seeing the issue on my machine. I can then set appropriate "breakpoints" in the code to attempt to diagnose what the code is doing and where it is going wrong.
Not a problem, I will send a smaller one tomorrow if that's OK.
Thank you for your help.
Sure I’ll have a look at it soon, might not be tomorrow as I’ve a friends thing online in evening after work.
Of course, sorry, I wasn’t suggesting you should/ would have it done. I appreciate you’re a volunteer.
Hello,
Please find attached a file as requested.
Using Find My Past I have recreated a section of my tree by adding the census records for Christopher. I have only added the census records to Christopher’s profile, the other persons have been generated using the census data and generated via Christopher’s profile . I have not added any other sources.
To Christopher’s profile I have added census records for 1871, 81, 91, 1901, 1911 and 1939. Therefore if my understanding is correct, none of those dates should be red and because the other individuals have been added using the same census data their corresponding squares should not be red.
@.***D71A8E.63E529C0]
Please let me know if I can be of anymore help.
Unfortunately GitHub strips attachments if you reply to this announcement. You'd need to email me at ftanalyzer@gmail.com again.
However I can only see one Christopher in your full file so perhaps this is him...
If so it looks ok for me in v8.3.1 so perhaps I fixed it when I tweaked the fix for preferred facts.
As a test in v8.3.0 can you turn on the option in General Settings to include alternate facts. I suspect this may fix the issue, in which case the fix in v8.3.1 works for census facts without that option.
New smaller file shows the following : Christopher still looks fine.
If this is what you were expecting I can close the issue as fixed in v8.3.1
Fixed in v8.3.1.
As requested I turned on the option in General Settings to include alternate facts. The following error message appeared;
@.***D71AAF.7E165230]
Details Read;
See the end of this message for details on invoking just-in-time (JIT) debugging instead of this dialog box.
** Exception Text ** System.ArgumentException: Parameter is not valid. at System.Drawing.Font.GetHeight(Graphics graphics) at System.Drawing.Font.GetHeight() at System.Drawing.Font.get_Height() at System.Windows.Forms.GroupBoxRenderer.DrawThemedGroupBoxWithText(Graphics g, Rectangle bounds, String groupBoxText, Font font, Color textColor, TextFormatFlags flags, GroupBoxState state) at System.Windows.Forms.GroupBoxRenderer.DrawGroupBox(Graphics g, Rectangle bounds, String groupBoxText, Font font, TextFormatFlags flags, GroupBoxState state) at System.Windows.Forms.GroupBox.OnPaint(PaintEventArgs e) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.PaintWithErrorHandling(PaintEventArgs e, Int16 layer) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WmPaint(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.GroupBox.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam)
** JIT Debugging ** To enable just-in-time (JIT) debugging, the .config file for this application or computer (machine.config) must have the jitDebugging value set in the system.windows.forms section. The application must also be compiled with debugging enabled.
For example:
When JIT debugging is enabled, any unhandled exception will be sent to the JIT debugger registered on the computer rather than be handled by this dialog box.
The Research Suggestions – View UK colour Census Report now appears as follows (despite the above error) – this appears to match yours. I have crosschecked this with the reference file and it appears to now shows the census records correctly.
@.***D71AAF.7E165230]
Thank you for such a swift response, thank you .
James
Sent from Mailhttps://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows 10
From: Alexander @.> Sent: 16 March 2021 21:44 To: @.> Cc: @.>; @.> Subject: Re: [ShammyLevva/FTAnalyzer] View UK colour Census Report _ fails to correctly identify already found Census #213 (#213)
Closed #213https://github.com/ShammyLevva/FTAnalyzer/issues/213.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ShammyLevva/FTAnalyzer/issues/213#event-4467057540, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATHHW3DYIF5T7IJFMVMHZDDTD7GMLANCNFSM4ZFF2CWQ.
When using the Research Suggestion tab, view UK Colour Census Report function, the report indicates almost all of the individuals have no census linked to them. This is incorrect, some actually have all of them. I have checked using individuals who I know to have all the records. This issue is a recent occurrence.
I have re-installed the software - version 8 .3.0.0 and the problem continues.
My Gedcom file is generated by FindMyPast.