ShayHill
commented
3 years ago Docx2Python v2 now recognizes <m:t> elements, so will capture some information from equations. For equations in Linear format, Docx2Python v2 will export valid Latex.
Equations in "Professional" format will not return anything useful. A simple integral from 0 to 1 would return "01x". It might be straightforward to write a parser to replace
- subscripts with
_ - superscripts with
^ - etc.
Someone might come behind me and do it, but there's little return in going down that (pretty much impossible to comprehensively test) road, as Word will easily convert all equations in a document to "Linear" format. These now export nicely from Docx2Python v2. That same integral in Inline format will export as:
'\\int_{0}^{1}x'
Here's a peek at the xml for a summation in Professional format. The information is there if anyone wants to extend this module with a parser. I suggest not for the previously mentioned testing issues.
<m:nary>
<m:naryPr>
<m:chr m:val="∑"/>
<m:limLoc m:val="subSup"/>
<m:ctrlPr>
<w:rPr>
<w:rFonts w:ascii="Cambria Math" w:hAnsi="Cambria Math"/>
<w:i/>
</w:rPr>
</m:ctrlPr>
</m:naryPr>
<m:sub>
<m:r>
<w:rPr>
<w:rFonts w:ascii="Cambria Math" w:hAnsi="Cambria Math"/>
</w:rPr>
<m:t>
0
</m:t>
</m:r>
</m:sub>
<m:sup>
<m:r>
<w:rPr>
<w:rFonts w:ascii="Cambria Math" w:hAnsi="Cambria Math"/>
</w:rPr>
<m:t>
1
</m:t>
</m:r>
</m:sup>
<m:e>
<m:r>
<w:rPr>
<w:rFonts w:ascii="Cambria Math" w:hAnsi="Cambria Math"/>
</w:rPr>
<m:t>
x
</m:t>
</m:r>
</m:e>
</m:nary>Thank you, sreeroopnaidu.
usr3
it will show empty array []