Open qingzengLi opened 1 week ago
In addition, the quantification of mRNA showed a high correlation
Different tools can give different results because of the differences between algorithms and settings. Can you provide more details about how the results are different?
Sure,thanks for your reply,my gtf file like this
1 StringTie transcript 15355 19694 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.1";
1 StringTie exon 15355 15514 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.1"; exon_number "1";
1 StringTie exon 16251 16436 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.1"; exon_number "2";
1 StringTie exon 17155 19694 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.1"; exon_number "3";
1 StringTie transcript 15768 19694 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.2";
1 StringTie exon 15768 15973 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.2"; exon_number "1";
1 StringTie exon 16152 16533 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.2"; exon_number "2";
1 StringTie exon 16713 18090 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.2"; exon_number "3";
1 StringTie exon 18271 19694 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.2"; exon_number "4";
1 StringTie transcript 15768 19694 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.3";
1 StringTie exon 15768 15973 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.3"; exon_number "1";
1 StringTie exon 16152 16331 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.3"; exon_number "2";
1 StringTie exon 17791 19694 1000 + . gene_id "MSTRG.1"; transcript_id "MSTRG.1.3"; exon_number "3";
And I checked the values of the same lncRNAs in the same samples using two different quantification methods, and found that the values in the two matrices show no correlation
I'm trying to use featureCounts to quantify lncRNA data, the lncRNA gtf file is generated from stringtie. I find that the expression matrix is different from the matrix generated by stringtie.Which software is more accurate? Here are the commads