Closed chibai closed 7 years ago
I have never said that the method I used is MBLBP. MBLBP is a kind of good feature and better than HAAR, you can try it. The method used in libfacedetection is much better than MBLBP. The training and detection are developed by ourselves, and do not use the methods in OpenCV.
well, how you explain this issue 1?? Did you change your feature in the last 2 years? @ShiqiYu
But not now.
2017-05-16 9:26 GMT+08:00 chibai notifications@github.com:
[image: 1] https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5702248/26085841/970e8a8e-3a19-11e7-80d4-0de43bf1a11e.png well, how you explain this issue 1?? Did you change your feature in the last 2 years? @ShiqiYu https://github.com/shiqiyu
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/ShiqiYu/libfacedetection/issues/37#issuecomment-301649121, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG0eHeYt-jeDD1VM2eIwZU7gMRupZH6qks5r6PtGgaJpZM4Na7ab .
-- Dr. Shiqi YU (于仕琪) College of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, 518060, China +86-755-2673 3127
in your earlier issue, you admitted that you use multi-block LBP approach in face detection. http://docs.opencv.org/3.2.0/dc/d88/tutorial_traincascade.html In the bottom part of the website, it shows that the opencv Cascade Classifier Training LBP mode is using multi-block LBP as feature. So here comes the tough question: Did your group use opencv3.0 to train your face detection model and rewrite into C code? if not, do you think the opencv3.0 LBP mode can train the performance-similar model with your database(20GB negative samples).