Currently, the project, gem and executable each use a different spelling:
The project in GitHub is called erb-lint
The gem is called erb_lint
The executable is called erblint
Fortunately, the configuration file matches the GitHub project and is called .erb-lint.yml.
This situation causes some confusion. For me, the main problem is finding the call to erblint in my zsh history, but it also makes finding the gem on rubygems.org more difficult.
How about standardizing on erb-lint? The other spellings could be kept as a fallback, by:
Having both erblint and erb-lint as executables
Having both erb_lint and erb-lint gems, where one would depend on the other
Currently, the project, gem and executable each use a different spelling:
erb-linterb_linterblintFortunately, the configuration file matches the GitHub project and is called
.erb-lint.yml.This situation causes some confusion. For me, the main problem is finding the call to
erblintin my zsh history, but it also makes finding the gem on rubygems.org more difficult.How about standardizing on
erb-lint? The other spellings could be kept as a fallback, by:erblintanderb-lintas executableserb_lintanderb-lintgems, where one would depend on the other