Invalid command error lacks specificity

[ShyamKrishna33]

When the user uses the results command and types result (without an 's'), the error states that it is an invalid command. But the user is confused about whether the problem is with the details keyword or with the index.

This could be enhanced by stating that - 'result' command not found.

[soc-pe-bot]

Team's Response

That's a good suggestion to improve the specificity of the error message. But that shouldn't be a problem here. The command format is clearly wrong based on the user guide. In addition, the error message also specifies that it is the command itself that is invalid, as opposed to the parameters.

Items for the Tester to Verify

:question: Issue response

Team chose [response.NotInScope]

• [ ] I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]

---