No need to push skill tree twice

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

PR Quality Checklist

• [X] I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black . --exclude test.py
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[github-actions[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Removing redundant push to the skill tree in the CI pipeline

• 📌 Type of PR: Refactoring

• ✨ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused as it only involves changes related to the CI pipeline.

• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

  PR Feedback

• General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and focused on a specific issue. However, it would be beneficial to add some tests to ensure that the changes do not introduce any unexpected behavior.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: .github/workflows/ci.yml suggestion: Consider handling the error in a more explicit way. Instead of using '|| echo', you could use a proper if-else statement to check the exit status of the git push command. This would make the code more readable and easier to maintain. [medium] relevant line: git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/main || echo "Already pushed the website, no need to push again."

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.