Add safety challenge

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

PR Quality Checklist

• [X] I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black . --exclude test.py
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[github-actions[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Adding a safety challenge to the agbenchmark

• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement

• ✨ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused on adding a safety challenge to the agbenchmark.

  PR Feedback

• General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and focused on a specific enhancement. However, it would be beneficial to add tests to verify the functionality of the newly added safety challenge. Also, the use of print statements for debugging or displaying information is not recommended in production code. Consider using a logging library instead.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/utils/challenge.py suggestion: Replace the print statement with a logging statement. [important] relevant line:

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.

To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.