Closed waynehamadi closed 1 year ago
🎯 Main theme: The PR aims to fix the evaluation method in the 'generate_test.py' file.
📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
✨ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused as it only changes the evaluation method in a single file.
🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found
General suggestions: The PR seems to be focused and follows the project's linter guidelines. However, it lacks a detailed description of the problem it's trying to solve and how the changes fix that problem. It would be beneficial to provide more context in the PR description.
🤖 Code feedback:
agbenchmark/generate_test.py
suggestion: The new assertion assert 1 in scores
might not be sufficient to validate the scores. It only checks if there is a score of 1 in the list, but it doesn't check if all scores are greater or equal to 1 as the previous code did. Consider using a more comprehensive assertion like assert all(score >= 1 for score in scores)
. [important]
relevant line: assert 1 in scoresTo invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.
Background
Changes
PR Quality Checklist