Closed waynehamadi closed 1 year ago
🎯 Main theme: Fixing the evaluation method in the test suite
📌 Type of PR: Bug fix
✨ Focused PR: Yes, the PR is focused on fixing the evaluation method in the test suite.
🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found
General suggestions: The PR seems to be well-structured and focused on a specific issue. However, it would be beneficial to add tests that cover this specific change to ensure it works as expected and prevent future regressions.
🤖 Code feedback:
agbenchmark/generate_test.py
suggestion: Consider adding a null check before accessing the "values" key in the scores dictionary. This will prevent a KeyError if the "values" key does not exist. [important]
relevant line: assert 1 in scores["values"]To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
To edit any configuration parameter from 'configuration.toml', add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.
Background
Changes
PR Quality Checklist