Tic tac toe challenge

[waynehamadi]

Background

Changes

Tic Tac Toe game

PR Quality Checklist

• [X] I have run the following commands against my code to ensure it passes our linters:

  black . --exclude test.py
  isort .
  mypy .
  autoflake --remove-all-unused-imports --recursive --ignore-init-module-imports --ignore-pass-after-docstring --in-place agbenchmark

[github-actions[bot]]

PR Analysis

• 🎯 Main theme: Implementation of a Tic Tac Toe game

• 📝 PR summary: This PR introduces a new Tic Tac Toe game implemented in Python. The game is played on the command line, with players taking turns to input their moves. The game ends when one player has three of their numbers in a row or all squares on the grid are filled with no player having three in a row, resulting in a draw. The PR also includes tests for the game.

• 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement

• 🧪 Relevant tests added: Yes

• 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

  PR Feedback

• 💡 General suggestions: The PR is well-structured and the game implementation seems to follow the rules of Tic Tac Toe correctly. However, there are some areas where the code could be improved for readability and efficiency. For instance, the winner checking logic is repeated multiple times, which could be refactored into a single function. Also, the input validation could be improved to handle unexpected inputs more gracefully.

• 🤖 Code feedback:

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/4_tic_tac_toe/artifacts_out/tic_tac_toe.py suggestion: Refactor the winner checking logic into a single function to avoid repetition and improve readability. [important] relevant line: '+def winner(board):'

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/4_tic_tac_toe/artifacts_out/tic_tac_toe.py suggestion: Improve input validation to handle unexpected inputs more gracefully. Currently, the game might crash if the input is not in the expected format. [medium] relevant line: '+def getLocation():'

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/4_tic_tac_toe/artifacts_out/tic_tac_toe.py suggestion: Consider using more descriptive function and variable names to improve code readability. For example, 'check' could be renamed to 'check_row_or_column_for_winner'. [medium] relevant line: '+def check(list):'

  • relevant file: agbenchmark/challenges/verticals/code/4_tic_tac_toe/artifacts_out/tic_tac_toe.py suggestion: Consider adding some comments to explain the logic of the game, especially for the more complex parts like the winner checking logic. [medium] relevant line: '+def gamePlay():'

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands: /review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option. /describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR. /improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback. /ask \<QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR. /update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..." To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.