Closed majdyz closed 4 months ago
It's not very easy to try out.
Can you make a click command that I can pass in an app name description and it generates the code and runs the ui.
That would make it much easier to understand what it can do and how its used.
Let's avoid merging this until it's more mature, so this PR should probably be a draft, or merged to a more permanent branch.
@Torantulino why wait, this isn't in any code paths that are executed by default
@Torantulino why wait, this isn't in any code paths that are executed by default
Right I see, that's fine then. As long as it won't effect our users then it's okay to merge.
/review
โฑ๏ธ Estimated effort to review [1-5] | 4, due to the extensive changes across multiple files, including the addition of new functionality, integration with external libraries, and modifications to existing code. The complexity and breadth of the changes require a thorough review to ensure functionality, performance, and security. |
๐งช Relevant tests | Yes |
๐ Possible issues | Possible Bug: The use of `async` in the `create_sample_app` function in 'codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py' might not handle exceptions properly if the database operations fail. Consider adding exception handling around the database calls. |
Performance Concern: The function `create_sample_app` in 'codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py' and similar functions make multiple asynchronous database calls in sequence, which could be optimized by using `asyncio.gather` to run them concurrently. | |
๐ Security concerns | No |
relevant file | codex/tests/gen_test.py |
suggestion | Consider using `asyncio.gather` for concurrent database operations in `create_sample_app` to improve performance. This change allows multiple I/O-bound tasks to run concurrently, which can significantly reduce the waiting time for I/O operations to complete. [important] |
relevant line | app = await get_app_by_id(user_id, app_id) |
relevant file | codex/develop/code_validation.py |
suggestion | Add error handling for the `validate_code` function to manage exceptions that might occur during the code validation process, such as connectivity issues with external services used in validation. This will make the function more robust and reliable. [important] |
relevant line | route_errors_as_todo: bool, |
relevant file | codex/develop/agent.py |
suggestion | Refactor the `process_api_route` function to reduce its complexity by breaking it down into smaller, more manageable functions. This can improve readability and maintainability. [medium] |
relevant line | lang: str = "python", |
relevant file | codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py |
suggestion | Implement caching for database queries in the `create_sample_app` function to enhance performance, especially when dealing with repeated queries for the same data. [medium] |
relevant line | app = await get_app_by_id(user_id, app_id) |
**Action:** test |
**Failed stage:** [Install Python dependencies](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/codex/actions/runs/8849691679/job/24302250736) [โ] |
**Failure summary:**
The action failed due to a mismatch between the pyproject.toml file and the poetry.lock file. The pyproject.toml file has changed significantly since the poetry.lock file was last generated, which requires updating the lock file by running poetry lock [--no-update] . |
Relevant error logs:```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 538: Installing Poetry (1.8.2): Creating script 539: Installing Poetry (1.8.2): Done 540: Poetry (1.8.2) is installed now. Great! 541: You can test that everything is set up by executing: 542: `poetry --version` 543: Creating virtualenv codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11 in /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs 544: Installing dependencies from lock file 545: pyproject.toml changed significantly since poetry.lock was last generated. Run `poetry lock [--no-update]` to fix the lock file. 546: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1. ``` |
This is a very early prototype of the front-end code generation.
The current implementation is still super basic, but the idea is to evaluate early if this is possible. The hypothesis is if we can build a small fully working UI component, we can utilize more sophisticated agentic prompting.
I created a video of the quick run-through of the code and how to test it https://www.loom.com/share/b331582fa2694ece8594c00ae78c71e5?sid=59b6baa6-ca9b-4f46-bb7e-76a82b1fce98
These are the possible next steps: https://www.notion.so/auto-gpt/Front-end-Codex-Plan-abf6c1d990104d23b758960cbaea26f9