[AGPT-714] Implement inter-page linking on front-end page decomposition by prompting

majdyz commented 2 months ago

User description

Changes:

Hint the UI page generation with its connection to another pages.
Add validation on the page connection prompting
Cleaner auto import on missing function and missing object (remove wildcard, import only the missing part). on missing object we try to find the related function and import the file that hosts that function (only support the object type referred by the ApiRouteSpec, it can still be improved).

Out of scope:

Validation of ui.link and page connection (if LLM hallucinate the page on ui.link, we are not failing this yet!)

Type

Enhancement, Bug fix

Description

Enhanced code validation to include checks for ui.link usage and ensure it references valid functions.
Improved import handling in __fix_missing_imports by adding async fetching of functions related to object types and better error message integration.
Added a new database function get_object_type_referred_functions to fetch functions related to an object type.
Updated PageDecompositionEntry to use a dictionary for used_functions to include descriptions, and added PageConnection model for describing connections between pages.
Enhanced validation in PageDecompositionBlock to include checks for main function naming, existence of a home page, and valid page connections.
Updated Jinja2 template example to reflect new features in page decomposition, including detailed function usage and page connections.

Changes walkthrough

Relevant files

Enhancement

code_validation.py `Enhance Code Validation and Import Handling` codex/develop/code_validation.py Added validation for `ui.link` usage in function code to ensure it references valid functions. Enhanced the `__fix_missing_imports` function to handle missing imports more accurately, including async fetching of functions related to object types. Improved error handling by appending problematic lines to error messages.	+35/-10
database.py `Add Database Function for Object Type Function Fetching` codex/develop/database.py Added a new function `get_object_type_referred_functions` to fetch functions related to an object type.	+23/-1
ai_page_decompose.py `Enhance Page Decomposition with Detailed Function Usage and Page` `Connections` codex/requirements/blocks/ai_page_decompose.py Updated `PageDecompositionEntry` to use a dictionary for `used_functions` to include descriptions. Added `PageConnection` model to describe connections between pages. Enhanced validation in `PageDecompositionBlock` to include checks for main function naming, existence of a home page, and valid page connections.	+55/-9

Documentation

system.j2

Update Example to Demonstrate Enhanced Page Decomposition Features

codex/prompts/gpt-4-turbo/requirements/page_decompose/system.j2

Modified the example to reflect changes in the PageDecompositionEntry
model using a dictionary for used_functions.

Added connections field to demonstrate inter-page linking in the
example.

+26/-11

✨ PR-Agent usage: Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

linear[bot] commented 2 months ago

AGPT-714

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

PR Description updated to latest commit (https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/codex/commit/b730129aba32bb8e47c1e7b07183ecf5550da587)

[ ] Copy walkthrough table to "Files Changed" Tab

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

PR Review

⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]	4, due to the complexity of the changes involving multiple files and the integration of new functionality with existing systems. The PR includes enhancements to validation logic, database interactions, and template updates, requiring careful review to ensure correctness and maintainability.
🧪 Relevant tests	No
🔍 Possible issues	Possible Bug: The implementation of `__fix_missing_imports` now includes asynchronous calls but does not handle exceptions that might be thrown by `get_object_type_referred_functions`. This could lead to unhandled promise rejections or crashes if the database queries fail.
🔍 Possible issues	Inconsistency: The `validate` method in `PageDecompositionBlock` uses a new `ListValidationError` for accumulating validation errors, but it's unclear how these errors are handled or reported back to the user. This could potentially lead to a situation where errors are collected but not properly utilized or displayed.
🔒 Security concerns	No

Code feedback:

relevant file	codex/develop/code_validation.py
suggestion	Consider handling exceptions for asynchronous database calls within `__fix_missing_imports`. This will ensure that the function is robust against database connectivity issues or data inconsistencies. You can wrap the `await get_object_type_referred_functions(object_type_id)` call in a try-except block and handle specific exceptions to provide clearer error messages or fallback behaviors. [important]
relevant line	functions = await get_object_type_referred_functions(object_type_id)

relevant file	codex/develop/code_validation.py
suggestion	Refactor the `__fix_missing_imports` to improve readability and maintainability. Currently, the function is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider breaking it down into smaller functions or methods, each handling a specific part of the import fixing process, such as resolving missing types, fetching necessary functions, and constructing import statements. This will make the code easier to understand and maintain. [medium]
relevant line	async def __fix_missing_imports(

relevant file	codex/requirements/blocks/ai_page_decompose.py
suggestion	Ensure that the `ListValidationError` is properly utilized in the `validate` method of `PageDecompositionBlock`. If the intention is to collect all validation errors and then raise them at once, make sure that the `raise_if_errors` method effectively communicates these errors back to the caller or logs them appropriately. This might involve integrating with the existing error handling framework or ensuring compatibility with the response structure expected by callers. [important]
relevant line	validation_errors.raise_if_errors()

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

Changelog updates:

2024-05-01

Added

Introduced PageConnection model to describe connections between pages in page decomposition.
Added validation for ui.link usage ensuring it references valid functions and implemented detailed function usage in page decomposition templates.

Changed

Enhanced __fix_missing_imports function to support async fetching of functions related to object types and improved error message integration.
Updated PageDecompositionEntry to use a dictionary for used_functions to include descriptions.

Fixed

Improved validation in PageDecompositionBlock to check for main function naming, existence of a home page, and valid page connections.

to commit the new content to the CHANGELOG.md file, please type: '/update_changelog --pr_update_changelog.push_changelog_changes=true'

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

PR Analysis

This screen contains a list of code components that were changed in this PR.
You can initiate specific actions for each component, by checking the relevant boxes.
After you check a box, the action will be performed automatically by PR-Agent.
Results will appear as a comment on the PR, typically after 30-60 seconds.

file

Changed components

code_validation.py

- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	validate_code ^{(method of CodeValidator)}	+6/-1
- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	__execute_ruff ^(function)	+4/-2
- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	__fix_missing_imports ^(function)	+24/-9

database.py

- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar

get_object_type_referred_functions

^(function)

+14/-0

ai_page_decompose.py

- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	PageDecompositionEntry ^(class)	+6/-0
- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	PageConnection ^(class)	+3/-0
- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	PageDecompositionResponse ^(class)	+1/-0
- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	validate ^{(method of PageDecompositionBlock)}	+50/-0
- [ ] Test - [ ] Docs - [ ] Improve - [ ] Similar	create_item ^{(method of PageDecompositionBlock)}	+55/-0

✨ Usage guide:

Using static code analysis capabilities, the `analyze` tool scans the PR code changes and find the code components (methods, functions, classes) that changed in the PR. The tool can be triggered [automatically](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/usage-guide/automations_and_usage/#github-app-automatic-tools-when-a-new-pr-is-opened) every time a new PR is opened, or can be invoked manually by commenting on any PR: ``` /analyze ``` Language that are currently supported: Python, Java, C++, JavaScript, TypeScript. See more information about the tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/analyze/).

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback

**Action:** test

**Failed stage:** [Test with pytest](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/codex/actions/runs/8910837291/job/24470887065) [❌]

**Failed test name:** compile_test.py

**Failure summary:** The action failed due to two assertion errors in codex/tests/compile_test.py. The tests
test_process_object_type and test_process_enum_type failed because the generated output did not
match the expected output. Specifically, the formatting of the output was incorrect, with
differences in indentation and line breaks around the class and enum definitions.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 589: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py ........ [ 49%] 590: codex/tests/exec_external_tool_test.py ...... [ 58%] 591: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py ...... [ 68%] 592: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py .. [ 71%] 593: codex/tests/api_test.py sssss [ 79%] 594: codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py ss [ 82%] 595: codex/tests/gen_test.py ssssssssss [ 98%] 596: codex/tests/model_test.py s [100%] 597: =================================== FAILURES =================================== ... 629: \"\"\" 630: Represents a person 631: \"\"\" 632: name: str # The name of the person 633: age: int # The age of the person""" 634: > assert ( 635: pydantic_output == expected_output 636: ), f"Expected {pydantic_output} to be {expected_output}" 637: E AssertionError: Expected class Person(BaseModel): ... 653: E ? ++++ 654: E - """ 655: E + """ 656: E ? ++++ 657: E name: str # The name of the person 658: E - age: int # The age of the person 659: E + age: int # The age of the person 660: E ? ++++ 661: codex/tests/compile_test.py:48: AssertionError ... 691: output = generate_object_template(obj) 692: expected_output = """class Role(Enum): 693: \"\"\" 694: Represents a role 695: \"\"\" 696: ADMIN: str # The admin role 697: USER: str # The user role""" 698: > assert output == expected_output, f"Expected {output} to be {expected_output}" 699: E AssertionError: Expected class Role(Enum): ... 715: E ? ++++ 716: E - """ 717: E + """ 718: E ? ++++ 719: E ADMIN: str # The admin role 720: E - USER: str # The user role 721: E + USER: str # The user role 722: E ? ++++ 723: codex/tests/compile_test.py:89: AssertionError 724: =============================== warnings summary =============================== 725: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py:11 726: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py:11: UserWarning: Using slow pure-python SequenceMatcher. Install python-Levenshtein to remove this warning 727: warnings.warn('Using slow pure-python SequenceMatcher. Install python-Levenshtein to remove this warning') 728: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31 729: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 730: @validator("provider") 731: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44 732: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 749: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py:26 750: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py:26: PytestUnknownMarkWarning: Unknown pytest.mark.unit - is this a typo? You can register custom marks to avoid this warning - for details, see https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/mark.html 751: @pytest.mark.unit 752: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_using_model_not_in_db 753: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_cross_model 754: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/requirements/blocks/ai_endpoint.py:330: DeprecationWarning: The 'warn' function is deprecated, use 'warning' instead 755: logging.warn(f"Resolving invalid type: {invalid_type}") 756: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_cross_model 757: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/main.py:1265: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: The `copy` method is deprecated; use `model_copy` instead. See the docstring of `BaseModel.copy` for details about how to handle `include` and `exclude`. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 825: codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py 89 57 36% 826: codex/tests/gen_test.py 128 64 50% 827: codex/tests/model_test.py 24 13 46% 828: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py 178 0 100% 829: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py 14 0 100% 830: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 831: TOTAL 5015 2247 55% 832: =========================== short test summary info ============================ 833: FAILED codex/tests/compile_test.py::test_process_object_type - AssertionError: Expected class Person(BaseModel): ... 849: ? ++++ 850: - """ 851: + """ 852: ? ++++ 853: name: str # The name of the person 854: - age: int # The age of the person 855: + age: int # The age of the person 856: ? ++++ 857: FAILED codex/tests/compile_test.py::test_process_enum_type - AssertionError: Expected class Role(Enum): ... 873: ? ++++ 874: - """ 875: + """ 876: ? ++++ 877: ADMIN: str # The admin role 878: - USER: str # The user role 879: + USER: str # The user role 880: ? ++++ 881: ============ 2 failed, 43 passed, 18 skipped, 12 warnings in 50.82s ============ 882: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1. ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback

**Action:** test

**Failed stage:** [Test with pytest](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/codex/actions/runs/8911109716/job/24471741791) [❌]

**Failure summary:** The action failed due to a syntax error in the file codex/common/model.py at line 113. The error was
caused by an f-string expression that incorrectly included a backslash. This syntax error prevented
the successful collection of tests across multiple test modules, resulting in errors during the test
collection phase for all test files that imported the problematic module.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 575: env: 576: pythonLocation: /opt/hostedtoolcache/Python/3.11.9/x64 577: ##[endgroup] 578: ============================= test session starts ============================== 579: platform linux -- Python 3.11.9, pytest-7.4.4, pluggy-1.5.0 580: rootdir: /home/runner/work/codex/codex 581: plugins: anyio-4.3.0, asyncio-0.23.6, integration-0.2.3, cov-4.1.0 582: asyncio: mode=Mode.STRICT 583: collected 6 items / 10 errors 584: ==================================== ERRORS ==================================== 585: ___________________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/api_test.py ___________________ ... 609: from codex.develop.compile import create_bundle_code 610: codex/develop/compile.py:24: in 611: from codex.develop.code_validation import CodeValidator 612: codex/develop/code_validation.py:33: in 613: from codex.common.model import FunctionDef 614: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 615: E """ 616: E ^ 617: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 618: ___________________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/ast_test.py ___________________ ... 634: exec(co, module.__dict__) 635: codex/tests/ast_test.py:3: in 636: from codex.develop.function_visitor import FunctionVisitor 637: codex/develop/function_visitor.py:4: in 638: from codex.common.model import ( 639: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 640: E """ 641: E ^ 642: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 643: _____________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/code_validation_test.py _____________ ... 653: ??? 654: :1147: in _find_and_load_unlocked 655: ??? 656: :690: in _load_unlocked 657: ??? 658: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py:186: in exec_module 659: exec(co, module.__dict__) 660: codex/tests/code_validation_test.py:5: in 661: from codex.develop.code_validation import CodeValidator, append_errors_as_todos 662: codex/develop/code_validation.py:33: in 663: from codex.common.model import FunctionDef 664: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 665: E """ 666: E ^ 667: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 668: _________________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/compile_test.py _________________ ... 686: from codex.develop.compile import ( 687: codex/develop/compile.py:24: in 688: from codex.develop.code_validation import CodeValidator 689: codex/develop/code_validation.py:33: in 690: from codex.common.model import FunctionDef 691: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 692: E """ 693: E ^ 694: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 695: _____________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py _____________ ... 711: exec(co, module.__dict__) 712: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py:1: in 713: import codex.requirements.blocks.ai_endpoint 714: codex/requirements/blocks/ai_endpoint.py:11: in 715: from codex.common.model import ObjectFieldModel, ObjectTypeModel 716: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 717: E """ 718: E ^ 719: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 720: ______________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py _______________ ... 744: from codex.develop.compile import create_bundle_code 745: codex/develop/compile.py:24: in 746: from codex.develop.code_validation import CodeValidator 747: codex/develop/code_validation.py:33: in 748: from codex.common.model import FunctionDef 749: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 750: E """ 751: E ^ 752: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 753: ___________________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/gen_test.py ___________________ ... 777: from codex.develop.compile import create_bundle_code 778: codex/develop/compile.py:24: in 779: from codex.develop.code_validation import CodeValidator 780: codex/develop/code_validation.py:33: in 781: from codex.common.model import FunctionDef 782: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 783: E """ 784: E ^ 785: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 786: __________________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/model_test.py __________________ ... 810: from codex.develop.compile import create_bundle_code 811: codex/develop/compile.py:24: in 812: from codex.develop.code_validation import CodeValidator 813: codex/develop/code_validation.py:33: in 814: from codex.common.model import FunctionDef 815: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 816: E """ 817: E ^ 818: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 819: ______________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py _______________ ... 835: exec(co, module.__dict__) 836: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py:4: in 837: from codex.develop.code_validation import validate_normalize_prisma 838: codex/develop/code_validation.py:33: in 839: from codex.common.model import FunctionDef 840: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 841: E """ 842: E ^ 843: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 844: ______________ ERROR collecting codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py _______________ ... 858: ??? 859: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/_pytest/assertion/rewrite.py:186: in exec_module 860: exec(co, module.__dict__) 861: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py:3: in 862: from codex.common.model import extract_field_type, is_type_equal 863: E File "/home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/model.py", line 113 864: E """ 865: E ^ 866: E SyntaxError: f-string expression part cannot include a backslash 867: =============================== warnings summary =============================== 868: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31 869: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 870: @validator("provider") 871: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44 872: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 911: codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py 89 83 7% 912: codex/tests/gen_test.py 128 122 5% 913: codex/tests/model_test.py 24 21 12% 914: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py 178 175 2% 915: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py 14 12 14% 916: -------------------------------------------------------------- 917: TOTAL 3381 2807 17% 918: =========================== short test summary info ============================ 919: ERROR codex/tests/api_test.py 920: ERROR codex/tests/ast_test.py 921: ERROR codex/tests/code_validation_test.py 922: ERROR codex/tests/compile_test.py 923: ERROR codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py 924: ERROR codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py 925: ERROR codex/tests/gen_test.py 926: ERROR codex/tests/model_test.py 927: ERROR codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py 928: ERROR codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py 929: !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Interrupted: 10 errors during collection !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 930: ======================== 2 warnings, 10 errors in 8.79s ======================== 931: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2. ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback

**Action:** test

**Failed stage:** [Test with pytest](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/codex/actions/runs/8911152827/job/24471870343) [❌]

**Failed test name:** compile_test.py

**Failure summary:** The action failed due to two assertion errors in the compile_test.py file. The tests
test_process_object_type and test_process_enum_type failed because the output generated by the code
did not match the expected output. Specifically:

In test_process_object_type, the formatting of the output for a class definition was incorrect, with
discrepancies in indentation and line breaks around the class properties.

In test_process_enum_type, similar formatting issues occurred with an enum definition, affecting the
indentation and line breaks around the enum values.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 587: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py ........ [ 49%] 588: codex/tests/exec_external_tool_test.py ...... [ 58%] 589: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py ...... [ 68%] 590: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py .. [ 71%] 591: codex/tests/api_test.py sssss [ 79%] 592: codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py ss [ 82%] 593: codex/tests/gen_test.py ssssssssss [ 98%] 594: codex/tests/model_test.py s [100%] 595: =================================== FAILURES =================================== ... 627: \"\"\" 628: Represents a person 629: \"\"\" 630: name: str # The name of the person 631: age: int # The age of the person""" 632: > assert ( 633: pydantic_output == expected_output 634: ), f"Expected {pydantic_output} to be {expected_output}" 635: E AssertionError: Expected class Person(BaseModel): ... 651: E ? ++++ 652: E - """ 653: E + """ 654: E ? ++++ 655: E name: str # The name of the person 656: E - age: int # The age of the person 657: E + age: int # The age of the person 658: E ? ++++ 659: codex/tests/compile_test.py:48: AssertionError ... 689: output = generate_object_template(obj) 690: expected_output = """class Role(Enum): 691: \"\"\" 692: Represents a role 693: \"\"\" 694: ADMIN: str # The admin role 695: USER: str # The user role""" 696: > assert output == expected_output, f"Expected {output} to be {expected_output}" 697: E AssertionError: Expected class Role(Enum): ... 713: E ? ++++ 714: E - """ 715: E + """ 716: E ? ++++ 717: E ADMIN: str # The admin role 718: E - USER: str # The user role 719: E + USER: str # The user role 720: E ? ++++ 721: codex/tests/compile_test.py:89: AssertionError 722: =============================== warnings summary =============================== 723: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py:11 724: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py:11: UserWarning: Using slow pure-python SequenceMatcher. Install python-Levenshtein to remove this warning 725: warnings.warn('Using slow pure-python SequenceMatcher. Install python-Levenshtein to remove this warning') 726: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31 727: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 728: @validator("provider") 729: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44 730: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 747: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py:26 748: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py:26: PytestUnknownMarkWarning: Unknown pytest.mark.unit - is this a typo? You can register custom marks to avoid this warning - for details, see https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/mark.html 749: @pytest.mark.unit 750: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_using_model_not_in_db 751: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_cross_model 752: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/requirements/blocks/ai_endpoint.py:330: DeprecationWarning: The 'warn' function is deprecated, use 'warning' instead 753: logging.warn(f"Resolving invalid type: {invalid_type}") 754: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_cross_model 755: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/main.py:1265: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: The `copy` method is deprecated; use `model_copy` instead. See the docstring of `BaseModel.copy` for details about how to handle `include` and `exclude`. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 823: codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py 89 57 36% 824: codex/tests/gen_test.py 128 64 50% 825: codex/tests/model_test.py 24 13 46% 826: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py 178 0 100% 827: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py 14 0 100% 828: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 829: TOTAL 5016 2248 55% 830: =========================== short test summary info ============================ 831: FAILED codex/tests/compile_test.py::test_process_object_type - AssertionError: Expected class Person(BaseModel): ... 847: ? ++++ 848: - """ 849: + """ 850: ? ++++ 851: name: str # The name of the person 852: - age: int # The age of the person 853: + age: int # The age of the person 854: ? ++++ 855: FAILED codex/tests/compile_test.py::test_process_enum_type - AssertionError: Expected class Role(Enum): ... 871: ? ++++ 872: - """ 873: + """ 874: ? ++++ 875: ADMIN: str # The admin role 876: - USER: str # The user role 877: + USER: str # The user role 878: ? ++++ 879: ============ 2 failed, 43 passed, 18 skipped, 12 warnings in 51.15s ============ 880: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1. ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

codiumai-pr-agent-pro[bot] commented 2 months ago

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback

**Action:** test

**Failed stage:** [Test with pytest](https://github.com/Significant-Gravitas/codex/actions/runs/8911210735/job/24472042678) [❌]

**Failed test name:** compile_test.py

**Failure summary:** The action failed due to two assertion errors in codex/tests/compile_test.py. The first failure
occurred in the test_process_object_type function where the output did not match the expected class
definition for Person. The second failure was in the test_process_enum_type function, where the
output did not match the expected enum definition for Role. Both failures were due to formatting
issues in the generated output, specifically incorrect indentation and spacing around class and enum
definitions.

Relevant error logs:

```yaml 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 587: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py ........ [ 49%] 588: codex/tests/exec_external_tool_test.py ...... [ 58%] 589: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py ...... [ 68%] 590: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py .. [ 71%] 591: codex/tests/api_test.py sssss [ 79%] 592: codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py ss [ 82%] 593: codex/tests/gen_test.py ssssssssss [ 98%] 594: codex/tests/model_test.py s [100%] 595: =================================== FAILURES =================================== ... 627: \"\"\" 628: Represents a person 629: \"\"\" 630: name: str # The name of the person 631: age: int # The age of the person""" 632: > assert ( 633: pydantic_output == expected_output 634: ), f"Expected {pydantic_output} to be {expected_output}" 635: E AssertionError: Expected class Person(BaseModel): ... 651: E ? ++++ 652: E - """ 653: E + """ 654: E ? ++++ 655: E name: str # The name of the person 656: E - age: int # The age of the person 657: E + age: int # The age of the person 658: E ? ++++ 659: codex/tests/compile_test.py:48: AssertionError ... 689: output = generate_object_template(obj) 690: expected_output = """class Role(Enum): 691: \"\"\" 692: Represents a role 693: \"\"\" 694: ADMIN: str # The admin role 695: USER: str # The user role""" 696: > assert output == expected_output, f"Expected {output} to be {expected_output}" 697: E AssertionError: Expected class Role(Enum): ... 713: E ? ++++ 714: E - """ 715: E + """ 716: E ? ++++ 717: E ADMIN: str # The admin role 718: E - USER: str # The user role 719: E + USER: str # The user role 720: E ? ++++ 721: codex/tests/compile_test.py:89: AssertionError 722: =============================== warnings summary =============================== 723: ../../../.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py:11 724: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fuzzywuzzy/fuzz.py:11: UserWarning: Using slow pure-python SequenceMatcher. Install python-Levenshtein to remove this warning 725: warnings.warn('Using slow pure-python SequenceMatcher. Install python-Levenshtein to remove this warning') 726: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31 727: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:31: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ 728: @validator("provider") 729: codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44 730: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/common/parse_prisma.py:44: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: Pydantic V1 style `@validator` validators are deprecated. You should migrate to Pydantic V2 style `@field_validator` validators, see the migration guide for more details. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 747: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py:26 748: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py:26: PytestUnknownMarkWarning: Unknown pytest.mark.unit - is this a typo? You can register custom marks to avoid this warning - for details, see https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/mark.html 749: @pytest.mark.unit 750: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_using_model_not_in_db 751: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_cross_model 752: /home/runner/work/codex/codex/codex/requirements/blocks/ai_endpoint.py:330: DeprecationWarning: The 'warn' function is deprecated, use 'warning' instead 753: logging.warn(f"Resolving invalid type: {invalid_type}") 754: codex/tests/endpoint_fixing_test.py::test_cross_model 755: /home/runner/.cache/pypoetry/virtualenvs/codex-ORswSzyp-py3.11/lib/python3.11/site-packages/pydantic/main.py:1265: PydanticDeprecatedSince20: The `copy` method is deprecated; use `model_copy` instead. See the docstring of `BaseModel.copy` for details about how to handle `include` and `exclude`. Deprecated in Pydantic V2.0 to be removed in V3.0. See Pydantic V2 Migration Guide at https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.7/migration/ ... 823: codex/tests/frontend_gen_test.py 89 57 36% 824: codex/tests/gen_test.py 128 64 50% 825: codex/tests/model_test.py 24 13 46% 826: codex/tests/prisma_parse_test.py 178 0 100% 827: codex/tests/type_parsing_test.py 14 0 100% 828: -------------------------------------------------------------------- 829: TOTAL 5017 2248 55% 830: =========================== short test summary info ============================ 831: FAILED codex/tests/compile_test.py::test_process_object_type - AssertionError: Expected class Person(BaseModel): ... 847: ? ++++ 848: - """ 849: + """ 850: ? ++++ 851: name: str # The name of the person 852: - age: int # The age of the person 853: + age: int # The age of the person 854: ? ++++ 855: FAILED codex/tests/compile_test.py::test_process_enum_type - AssertionError: Expected class Role(Enum): ... 871: ? ++++ 872: - """ 873: + """ 874: ? ++++ 875: ADMIN: str # The admin role 876: - USER: str # The user role 877: + USER: str # The user role 878: ? ++++ 879: ============ 2 failed, 43 passed, 18 skipped, 12 warnings in 50.51s ============ 880: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 1. ```

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

The CI feedback tool (`/checks)` automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check. The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks: - Failed stage - Failed test name - Failure summary - Relevant error logs In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR: ``` /checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}" ``` where `{repo_name}` is the name of the repository, `{run_number}` is the run number of the failed check, and `{job_number}` is the job number of the failed check. #### Configuration options - `enable_auto_checks_feedback` - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true. - `excluded_checks_list` - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list. - `enable_help_text` - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true. - `persistent_comment` - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true. - `final_update_message` - if `persistent_comment` is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true. See more information about the `checks` tool in the [docs](https://pr-agent-docs.codium.ai/tools/ci_feedback/).

Significant-Gravitas / AutoGPT-Code-Ability