Open Faur opened 7 years ago
I believe you are right - See Issues #9 and #19.
Yes, thank you!
According to your code and my understanding of the functionality of a dense block, there should also be a concatenation "around" the bottleneck dense block (concatenate input and output of bottleneck), otherwise number of feature maps dosen't match ... Am I right?
I am wondering if there isn't an error in Figure 1. In order to get m=256 in the last conv. layer there must be a skip connection around the last dense block in the upsampling path, which is valid, since there aren't any transition up blocks