final touches

[iroll]

• refactor code
• googly documentation
• think about app packaging

[SimLeek]

Apparently it's called Sphinx documentation. Whoops.

The code doesn't seem like it needs to be refactored, but I reorganized everything. If I had to do a lot more operations with things like XML, I might create a separate class for that stuff, but right now it seems like it would separate things too much.

Which systems should I package this app for? I might be able to create executables or binaries for some systems, but I don't know which repositories I can get it on.

(adding so I remember: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2933/an-executable-python-app)

[iroll]

If you can make a single windows package that a user can download and run stand-alone that would be perfect.

If you can make something where the user just has to install QT ahead of time that would be 2nd best.

If the user has to install python, pyqt, and qt it's basically pointless so don't worry about it =)

On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 4:50 PM, SimLeek notifications@github.com wrote:

Apparently it's called Sphinx documentation. Whoops.

The code doesn't seem like it needs to be refactored, but I reorganized everything. If I had to do a lot more operations with things like XML, I might create a separate class for that stuff, but right now it seems like it would separate things too much.

Which systems should I package this app for? I might be able to create executables or binaries for some systems, but I don't know which repositories I can get it on.

(adding so I remember: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2933/an-executable-python-app)

— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/SimLeek/silverpak-syringe-pump/issues/8#issuecomment-52259809 .

[iroll]

Let's change the scope of this to the following:

Use py2exe to make a standalone executable for windows.