Open SimonGoring opened 7 years ago
To update:
CrossRef accepts 26 different work types:
"book-section" "monograph" "report" "book-track" "journal-article" "book-part" "other" "book" "journal-volume" "book-set" "reference-entry" "proceedings-article" "journal" "component" "book-chapter" "report-series" "proceedings" "standard" "reference-book" "posted-content" "journal-issue" "dissertation" "dataset" "book-series" "edited-book" "standard-series"
I'd like to propose that we add these to the existing Neotoma Publication Types. This would align us with an industry standard. @iceageecologist @ericcgrimm
This seems like a good idea and probably/hopefully fairly straightforward to implement. Eric, what do you think?
Jack
On 1/10/2017 12:51 PM, Simon wrote:
To update:
CrossRef accepts 26 different work types:
"book-section" "monograph" "report" "book-track" "journal-article" "book-part" "other" "book" "journal-volume" "book-set" "reference-entry" "proceedings-article" "journal" "component" "book-chapter" "report-series" "proceedings" "standard" "reference-book" "posted-content" "journal-issue" "dissertation" "dataset" "book-series" "edited-book" "standard-series"
I'd like to propose that we add these to the existing Neotoma Publication Types. This would align us with an industry standard. @iceageecologist https://github.com/iceageecologist @ericcgrimm
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/SimonGoring/CrossRef_Publications/issues/1#issuecomment-271679324, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFm9arLaISGKgJmY1JCQ0pvKuD0UJTcRks5rQ-FYgaJpZM4LfxCD.
Neotoma provides 13 different publication types:
CrossRef provides "book", "book-chapter", "journal-article", "monograph", "report". These generally match up.
The "report" is a bit more problematic. Some reports appear to be articles/special reports, while others are stand-alone. Effectively "Book"s.