Getting this paper finished

[SimonGoring]

I think the paper is looking pretty good. By and large the text is finished (although some discussion could be added), the examples are generally solid, and most of the formatting seems to be working with the revised ToDocX_knit.R file. At least, it compiled for me.

To my mind these are the things to do:

• [x] go through the examples to see if we can tighten or simplify the code
• [x] fix the kable tables so that they output properly to docx (this likely involves some reading about how pandoc works). @karthik will fix
• [x] fix the plots to make them a bit nicer and add captions to the figures
• [x] get things to the OpenQuaternary standard: http://www.openquaternary.com/about/submissions
  • [x] Title page and author info to be added in a text file & appended to the Word Document (no need to include in the markdown)
  • [x] Abstract to 250 words
  • [x] Add five keywords
  • [x] Add acknowledgement section
  • [x] Make sure image resolution is up to 300dpi, presumably this would be done on the side.
  • [x] Check that dates are cited properly
• [x] Reference style
  • [x] Author year (no comma)
  • [x] Harvard author-date system
  • [x] where possible get the DOIs for the papers (ugh!)
• [x] neotoma stuff
  • The package needs to settle down, but there are a couple things I want to do:
  • [x] Make sure that the functions using download recognize the difference between one download object (of class download) and a list of downloads, also of class download. Maybe I can use the class argument as a flag, or just live with having to call object[[1]] even if there's only one download.

Feel free to add and check off. I'm probably missing some of the issues that @gavinsimpson raised earlier.

[SimonGoring]

The paper was submitted. I was lazy closing issues.