search

SimonRinguette / bpswg

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bpswg
0 stars 0 forks source link

BPSIM: If too late, please ignore... transferTime: redundant and potentially indeterminable? or a gap? #125

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
Assuming we are refering to an Activity (as indicated in BPSIM Parameters 
Applicability, page 27):
(a) redundant: wouldn't this be indicated by the in-bound flow's "transfer 
time"?... But wait, we don't capture that! Given (b), below, do we have a 
specificity gap here?
(b) indeterminable: if one Activity has 2+ plus precedent Activities, which one 
(i.e. flows from them) are talking about?

Sorry for the late comments :(

Razvan:-)

Original issue reported on code.google.com by razvan.r...@wwhc.us on 6 Feb 2013 at 6:10

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
By the way, ProVision (Open Text) solves issue (a) by allowing a Transition 
Time for Flows [separate from In-Queue and/or Out-Queue times, which are 
Activity specific].
At least I think it solves it. In BPMN, however... are Flows/Sequences assumed 
to be instantaneous (i.e. not take any time)? I can't remember 100% sure, is 
that what the BPMN specs say?

Original comment by razvan.r...@wwhc.us on 6 Feb 2013 at 8:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
As decided at 28 Feb 2013 meeting

Original comment by dga...@trisotech.com on 28 Feb 2013 at 7:18