Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Assuming that you are using the term Lag Time as intended in the current
specification,
you would simply assign a different Lag Time parameter to each of the sequence
flow. In your example the sequence flow coming from backoffice would be
assigned a value of 2 days. Assuming this time is constant from instances to
instances. If this lag time varies from instances to instances that you could
assign to a distribution parameter.
Original comment by dga...@trisotech.com
on 2 Mar 2012 at 3:19
Interesting idea allowing a Time parameter on a sequence flow to provide for
this behavior, a previous ISSUE 54 concerning parameters and where they are
applied suggest sequence flows can't have time parameters.
Alternatively a Task could be inserted on each of the sequence flows....to
accomodate the lag time.
Original comment by ghoo...@gmail.com
on 12 Mar 2012 at 10:33
Shouldn't the Lag time be applied to the Activity (or a added Intermediate
Timer Event... but that would mean altering the model), rather than to the
Sequence Flow? Per BPMN, unless I'm mistaken, Seq. Flows are assumed to be
instantaneous.
Original comment by razvan.r...@wwhc.us
on 15 Mar 2012 at 2:52
In fact sequence can have time parameters as was discussed in Paris. (Issue 54
is erroneous and will be commented appropriately).
As per execution semantic of BPMN 2.0 spec section1 3.2.1
Start quote:
Token movement across a Sequence Flow does not have any timing constraints. A
token might take a long or short time
to move across the Sequence Flow. If the isImmediate attribute of a Sequence
Flow has a value of false, or has
no value and is taken to mean false, then Activities not in the model MAY be
executed while the token is moving along
the Sequence Flow. If the isImmediate attribute of a Sequence Flow has a value
of true, or has no value and is
taken to mean true, then Activities not in the model MAY NOT be executed while
the token is moving along the
Sequence Flow
end quote.
Original comment by dga...@trisotech.com
on 15 Mar 2012 at 8:24
Closed Sept 20 Web Conference
Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com
on 20 Sep 2012 at 7:40
Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com
on 20 Sep 2012 at 7:40
Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com
on 24 Oct 2012 at 7:02
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
bpm....@gmail.com
on 2 Mar 2012 at 11:14