search

SimonRinguette / bpswg

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bpswg
0 stars 0 forks source link

The metamodel spec document needs separate sections for object properties #78

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The specification document would be better organized if each property 
(attribute or association) of a metaobject were discussed in its own 
subsection. Whether or not the subsection needs to be a numbered clause is 
debatable, but at least a heading naming the property is needed.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by pode...@gmail.com on 30 Mar 2012 at 6:56

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago 
The naming and numbering is now better aligned to what it is in the bpmn 2.0 
and xpdl specification (in version 0.5)

Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com on 18 Oct 2012 at 1:19

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com on 24 Oct 2012 at 7:05