SimonRinguette / bpswg

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/bpswg
0 stars 0 forks source link

How to deal with incorrect and/or underspecified(incomplete) process models #82

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
On 10 may meeting there was a general consensus  that we should handle 
underspecified models

Original issue reported on code.google.com by dga...@trisotech.com on 10 May 2012 at 8:04

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago
Nashua F2F Meeting
========================
The consensus is that you need a valid bpmn 2.0 model to start from.

Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com on 31 May 2012 at 6:53

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com on 20 Sep 2012 at 7:47

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by sringue...@trisotech.com on 24 Oct 2012 at 7:09