Closed pouvik closed 4 years ago
I think @SychO9 is or will be working on that at some point
My opinion on this is that I am not in favour of this change, I do not understand how it is better to turn this one block of code into multiple ones, if someone cannot find the class using the browser developer tools now how will they be able to find it if we tear it down to many blocks of code ? I don't see how that is related.
I'd love to hear @XinYenFon and @DiegoAndresCortes 's opinions on this though
I think @SychO9 is or will be working on that at some point
5665
No that is something different :-/
Re-reading this I don't find it confusing at all and I think it's fine as multiple elements share the same attributes like the background color
Additionally I agree that for a designer could be a bit of a headache separating these elements but some share certain areas that favor using the same colors.
This is not an issue at all.
Nope, more of a suggestion. I suggest we close this one under the argument provided by @SychO9
So I started experimenting with theme design on 2.1. And one thing that SMF is always saying is it wants people to be encouraged to design themes, Most if not all the 2.1 themes already on Theme Site are pretty much made by people that have made multiple designs, but for a new person their is alot of confusing areas specially in the CSS, if they want to do any thing really different, alot of classes are lumped together, multiple reasons we all know no pount having 100 classes saying the same, argument it will load faster (im skeptical on that).
One simple example is this on:
inner_section id is quite an important one, for those that do not know its the section where you find the Time, News, Linktree ad Navigation. For me it took a fair few hours to find it, granted I have not done a theme in ages and not looked at the 2.1 code for themes in alot longer. For someone starting out this will bring more support topics of just prevent any unique designs being made from potentially new themers, also it does not work with the flow of placement, this is on line 3802 the rest of the section for this id is on line 1160.
Suggestion is remove #inner_section from this area so it looks more like
and line 1160 where we have the id already:
changing it too