Closed gventuri closed 1 year ago
Do you plan to support all models or only the code ones?
@mspronesti it's a great question! Maybe all the models, provided that the non-code ones are good enough at generating code? We should definitely benchmark the quality of each model. What's your thoughts about it @mspronesti?
Let me find some literature on this, however, code-bison should be the default considering Google much have done some benchmarks already.
I have one point, should we include this support as it is already supported through LangChain Vertex Model?
@amjadraza great, totally agree.
Since langchain is an optional dependency, I think supporting the most widespread LLMs "natively" would be a much smoother process. The goal of PandasAI has always be being fast and easy to use, so any unnecessary configuration should be removed imo!
@amjadraza great, totally agree.
Since langchain is an optional dependency, I think supporting the most widespread LLMs "natively" would be a much smoother process. The goal of PandasAI has always be being fast and easy to use, so any unnecessary configuration should be removed imo!
Sure, I can work on this feature. Would as for help if needed.
Would be awesome, assigning it to you! Thanks a lot @amjadraza!
@gventuri please see the PR against this issue.
🚀 The feature
We should add the support for VertexAI models (i.e. PaLM 2).
Motivation, pitch
Given this is backed by Google, it will become increasingly important.
Alternatives
No response
Additional context