Closed bl24 closed 1 year ago
The fine labels are nested within the main labels, the former are just more finely resolved.
> table(X$label.fine, X$label.main)[,"Erythrocytes"]
Adipocytes aNSCs Astrocytes
0 0 0
Astrocytes activated B cells Cardiomyocytes
0 0 0
Dendritic cells Endothelial cells Ependymal
0 0 0
Erythrocytes Fibroblasts Fibroblasts activated
3 0 0
Fibroblasts senescent Granulocytes Hepatocytes
0 0 0
Macrophages Macrophages activated Microglia
0 0 0
Microglia activated Monocytes Neurons
0 0 0
Neurons activated NK cells NPCs
0 0 0
Oligodendrocytes OPCs qNSCs
0 0 0
T cells
0
I don't know what's going on in the above plot, though. Kind of wild to see erythrocytes and neurons getting mixed up. I assume you're using SingleR, so you might want to look at what markers are being used to identify each cell type.
That's correct. I used SingleR.
Hi, I used the MouseRNAseqData reference data to annotate the same data twice, once using the label.main annotation and once using the label.fine. I'm wondering how do I end up with clusters being labeled differently. For instance, the cluster that is labeled Erythrocytes changes depending on which annotation level I use.