Uncaught exception:
...e/Dev/Luvit/discordia/discordia-fork/tests/test-date.lua:179: expected: "date could not be converted to time", received: "...l/home/Dev/Luvit/discordia/discordia-fork/libs/class.lua:16: expected minimum 0, received -31536000"
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'assertError'
...e/Dev/Luvit/discordia/discordia-fork/tests/test-date.lua:179: in function 'fn'
[string "bundle:deps/require.lua"]:310: in function 'require'
...al/home/Dev/Luvit/discordia/discordia-fork/tests/run.lua:11: in function 'fn'
[string "bundle:deps/require.lua"]:310: in function 'require'
[string "bundle:/main.lua"]:128: in function <[string "bundle:/main.lua"]:20>
stack traceback:
[C]: in function 'error'
[string "bundle:/deps/utils.lua"]:41: in function 'assertResume'
[string "bundle:/init.lua"]:52: in function <[string "bundle:/init.lua"]:47>
[C]: in function 'xpcall'
[string "bundle:/init.lua"]:47: in function 'fn'
[string "bundle:deps/require.lua"]:310: in function <[string "bundle:deps/require.lua"]:266>
The system's clock is GMT+3.
Traced the error a bit, here os.time overflows returning a value of -31546800, here it seems like it fails to normalize it to 0 (if that was suppose to happen, don't seem it is) and here the error is raised.
Now the value passed in the test is 1969, so I suppose it is meant to raise this error? It is really expected to overflow in this case, so I guess the bug here is just the assertError call used.
Edit: At least what I assume, all of this is based on assumptions since I am not entirely sure what is the supposed behavior.
Running the tests yields the following error:
The system's clock is GMT+3.
Traced the error a bit, here os.time overflows returning a value of
-31546800, here it seems like it fails to normalize it to 0 (if that was suppose to happen, don't seem it is) and here the error is raised.Now the value passed in the test is 1969, so I suppose it is meant to raise this error? It is really expected to overflow in this case, so I guess the bug here is just the assertError call used. Edit: At least what I assume, all of this is based on assumptions since I am not entirely sure what is the supposed behavior.